[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 15 points 3 months ago

no, no, it's fine. the less readable they are, the better.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 15 points 3 months ago

dear me. doesn't he know that the actual art requires hate-skimming at most?

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago

i gues we're all living in the post-scarcity utopia then, because otherwise such growth would exhaust resources.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago

him referring to lysenkoism in this context is extra weird; the scientific racists and lysenko are but another facets of the antiscientific ignorance

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

like, one racist motherfucker is already one too many… how is that not obvious to the enlightened ~~reactionaries~~rationalists is beyond me.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 14 points 4 months ago

she's literally paid from an EA grant for the work at vox, so she can hardly compromise her journalistic ethics more.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 15 points 5 months ago

nah. there are too many billionaires though.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 14 points 10 months ago

their mistake, as usual, is not grokking that genuine human interactions might be ritualised, but are not rituals.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 14 points 10 months ago

i wonder if they realise how thick with internal jargon their language is, and how highly ritualised.

[-] mawhrin@awful.systems 15 points 10 months ago

most of the variance in the genome is linear in nature, by which I mean the effect of a gene doesn’t usually depend on which other genes are present

that person seems homeschooled on absolute bullshit; basic high school biology course thirty-odd years ago was saying otherwise.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

mawhrin

joined 1 year ago