[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

If you wrote this yourself, that's even more ironic, because you used the same format that ChatGPT likes to spit out. Humans influence ChatGPT -> ChatGPT influences humans. Everything's come full circle.

I ask though because on your profile you've used ChatGPT to write comments before.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you use AI to write this? Kinda ironic, don't you think?

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Do you have any source for your claim that comments on the Internet are public domain? It's a common sentiment that anything posted on the Internet is public, but I don't believe it has any legal basis. Often websites have a ToS saying that anything you submit belongs to them in perpetuity, but programming.dev doesn't have that.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was looking through the FDA website for references to these non-chemical pesticides, and this page was interesting: https://www.fda.gov/food/chemical-contaminants-pesticides/pesticides

It talks about "pesticide chemicals", with no mention of non-chemical pesticides anywhere. The FDA isn't in the business of distinguishing between synthetic and organic pesticides, that seems to be more in the realm of the USDA, and the USDA always says synthetic/organic, not chemical/non-chemical.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Harry Potter spaces are not unique in creating structure. There are tons of fandoms, with millions of members. It's not the first modern fandom by any means either. It's not like if HP suddenly disappeared there wouldn't be any fandoms of equivalent or larger size to provide "structure" to vulnerable people. Lots of them have more queer people in them too, and less transphobia.

I'm not sure what makes Harry Potter uniquely digital in your mind either. I'm sure you can interpret it as being about that, but I don't think that's the interpretation most people walk away with. Even if it really is a lens some people use to understand the Internet or whatnot, I certainly don't think it's the first story to be used in that way... There are a lot of stories that can claim that title that far predate Harry Potter, many of which have fandoms of their own.

I just don't think HP is an essential backbone of culture. It's important to a lot of people, for sure. And I can't imagine what it's like to realize that the creator of a work that's so important to you is a terrible person. That has got to be a really shitty situation to be in. But there are other fandoms out there. There's other great fiction, written by authors who won't weaponize your consumption against minorities. It's not a dichotomy of either you embrace Harry Potter or you must write your own.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

You don't brush your teeth in the morning too?

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's particularly hard to find authors who aren't actively spreading hate, actually. And I don't think Rowling's level of transphobia is a particularly specific purity test.

Plus, Rowling takes an active role in promoting hate. She's loud about it. She has a big platform because HP is so popular, and I think that makes her especially dangerous.

She certainly seems to put her money where her mouth is too.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

This is true, but also it's implied in technobabble that replicators operate on a lower "molecular" resolution whereas transporters operate on a quantum scale. I rationalize this as a space saving measure; when you're transporting living organisms, you need perfect precision, and thus a full pattern buffer worth of resolution. This is clearly expensive to store, so much so that it decays over time unless you do something tricky.

Replicators use a lower resolution scan, as you can just reassemble protein molecules into the right shape most of the time. Eddington complains about this issue. (The non-canon TNG technical manual mentions tanks full of protein sludge used for replicators.) Now, is this actually detectable by a human palate? Eh, maybe.

I imagine if you were to beam a plate of non-replicated food though, the full flavor profile wouldn't be lost. It's specifically the low resolution of the replicator tech.

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I figured that out eventually, but then I have to remember to go back to camp and pick up the dozens of mundane shortswords I sent to camp and sell them

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

What's the advantage for the bank?

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

It looks like the registrar changed the nameserver, which is a harder thing to recover from. Still, didn't keep them down for long. Looks like they figured something out

[-] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

True enough; it's a very different framing, but there's still love there, still passion.

I think a big difference is that Starfleet folks tend to be more intrinsically driven. Space isn't something that needs to be "made bearable" (unless you're McCoy I guess)—space is cool in its own right, tons of things to see and people to meet. But on top of that, the Federation has such a high tech level and quality of life that living on a starship is pretty luxurious.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

melmi

joined 2 years ago