[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Rob Ford

Do you mean Doug, or are we speaking ill of the dead?

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Sure, but any messaging app (including Signal) could have these backdoors in place. Heck, there's even vectors for unrelated apps on your phone to read this data once unencrypted.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, biking 37km each way is pretty extreme. However, if you haven't already, I'd suggest questioning whether you should be making some changes in your life. Using rough calculations for a fairly efficient & economical car ($0.25CAD/km for gas, maintenance, and depreciation), your commute is costing you $18.50CAD/day (more if you drive an SUV/Truck)! That means if you could move closer to work so you could bike, you could pay an additional $350/mo in housing and still be ahead. Or, you could look for a new job that pays $4,600/year less net (probably ~$6,500/year gross) and be ahead. And if you could give up your car completely, those numbers could more than double!!

It's possible after reviewing the numbers, you'll conclude that it's not worth it to make any changes in your life, and that's fine! Work in agricultural and other rural industries is important. It's just that so many people aren't even ware how much their 20min commute costs them, let alone what it costs their local government (roads aren't cheap) or the environment in general.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

It depends what you mean by "more than the basics." Some things I used to do which could be considered more complicated have already been handicapped (like using 3rd party services). Others aren't reliable so I stopped using them. Personally, I have no problem trying stuff out and speaking in the way the assistant understands, but there are very few complicated actions which are supported and reliable!

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Listen to your local police scanner.

Can't. It's encrypted.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

USB PD can currently do up to 240W. From what I understand, there's still more headroom, so if/when devices need more power they can continue to extend the standard.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s even better than that, it’s more like, “you better not ~~slightly~~ appear to inconvenience me or I might hurt you.”

FTFY, since well planned bike networks actually help to reduce congestion, making life better for drivers too!

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Since they're sold incomplete (without a bed), maybe he means outlawing them being modified like this one with a silly bed? Either way, I'm pretty sure you need a commercial air-brake license to drive this thing in most jurisdictions.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

There isn't a standard Catholic translation, so which one are you talking about? I've checked the NIV, NCB, NRSV, NJB and none of those say "their Thrusts". The only one I can find it in is the NAB and that's specifically a US version that as a Canadian who grew up Catholic, I'd never heard of before!

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It is not a monopoly. They have Apple as a major competitor

Thank god! Where can I download the Apple App store on to my Android phone? I can't? Then it's irrelevant to this conversation around Google's monopoly on Android.

Google allows sideloading within their own ecosystem.

As @logicbomb points out, just because a ecosystem is open, doesn't mean a monopoly doesn't exist. All the other stores are pretty niche and Google controls 90%+ of the market, so by definition it is a monopoly. A monopoly on it's own isn't illegal or even bad, and we have to dig in further to determine that. As you pointed out, it's pretty clear-cut that Apple has a forced monopoly where users have to actively work against the system to load apps outside of Apple's ecosystem. While Google's case isn't as clear many have argued that Google's Android has kneecapped alternative stores like Amazon's, possibly in anti-competitive ways.

I personally love f-droid, but Google does not make it an easy process to sideload!

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the interview, his mother says it's because if he let his hair down it might "extend below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes". I think it's a poorly written policy, because in my interpretation, he would only be in violation if he let his hair down, but he's in compliance as long as he never does that at school. And even then, would for example, an afro violate that? It sounds like they should have included in the policy “male students’ hair will must be no longer than 3" at any point" but again, that's a poorly written policy, waiting for holes to be punched in it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

n2burns

joined 1 year ago