[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

as with all technology though, as they become more accessible with newer models being made and other companies making foldables, the price for the same kind of quality product we have today will inevitably be less in the future.

this is already happening with cpu performance, display quality, etc.. it's finally very affordable to get a 120 hz phone with a fantastic display and snappy processor, specifically thinking of something like the Galaxy A54 or Pixel 8 (on a sale)

a general rule i use regarding technology purchasing is that newest featured top of the line products are best left to rich people who can afford it, as badly as i might want it.

this goes for cars, phones, etc.. one benefit to this is that it gives the product time to become not just more affordable, but better quality as well.

the earliest foldables cracked at their fold points, but Samsungs newest fold phone survived JerryRigEverythings bend test which is impressive.

in a few more years, this quality will surely be available at sub 1000 dollar prices, containing the most modern hardware which will be even better than is available now.

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

besides uBlock Origin,

Consentomatic automatically declines cookie consent notices. works very well.

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

indigenous, aboriginal, and aborigine, mean exactly the same thing. anyone getting offended at any of these word usages probably doesn't know the definiton.

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i've been raised as a Gen Z to learn "first nations", though aboriginal (from the root word aborigine) also means the exact same thing, so i personally don't comprehend how someone can find offense in using that word.

maybe they are used to seeing aboriginals to describe aussi natives? still, it essentially means "first of the region", or in other words, "first of the nation".

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

searchengine.party also has the query string links for a multitude of different search engines, as well as a comparison of security tests and privacy policies and other functions

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

isn't moral truth determined by people making moral judgements?

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sam Harris doesn't like this idea, lol. "morality is wellbeing!", well then what is wellbeing to a bad person? it's all relative

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i generally like reuters so i submitted feedback (bottom of reuters website) regarding that article in the hopes that something will come of it. i agree that it does seem very weird to do

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

i do chaotic neutral cause it's essentially neutral evil but with at least the illusion of a more secure seal

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

lawful neutral, then chaotic neutral when i lose the thingy

[-] neonspool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

the critic reviews have always been complete dogshit. too many movies get 100% or 0% on rotten tomatoes.

if i'm not mistaken IMDB ratings are only user based, and in my opinion, i almost never disagree with IMDB ratings and i think it's because it has a vastly larger voting group to get a more accurate viewer consensus even if a small number of critics give a 0/10 or 10/10

view more: next ›

neonspool

joined 1 year ago