Lol

Looks alright.

How do you feel about being human pet? How repetative and boring is this kind of performance?

Is it some kind of humorous thing?

Debian for multiple reasons doesn't even come close.

Big thing that people don't understand about Arch is that AUR is not part of distribution itself and package recipes there will break and mainteiners will go missing and arch won't care about them breaking.

Arch is extremely stable if you can read (this is not a joke). As in before doing system upgrade visit news and check if there is a need for manual steps during upgrade, you'llneed ro do something once or twice a year. And you actually need to read wiki and manual pages before doing things you aren't sure about.

As for manual step-by-step install, you can do it with almost any distro. For example you can partition disk, mount everything and install core packages using dnf --installroot=... from fedora live, same idea with debian based distros.

RHEL because it's the stable distro, Arch for being best desktop distro, Fedora for building seamless experience and being arch-lite for people that don't need arch.

Like g in gif.

It's that time of a year.

Actual concern, had these subtle issues with wine games multiple times. Often they aren't game breaking just annoying.

FPS is not that meaningful of a metric if you get worse graphics or flitches due to wine not implementing something. It might be something that you can't see of course.

What makes it 'modular'?