[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Not American, and couldn’t find a non-partisan resource, but here goes:

https://democrats.org/civic-engagement-and-voter-protection/

Our voter hotline exists to answer questions that cannot be easily answered online. The hotline is monitored by DNC employees who are prepared to field questions pertaining to felon disenfranchisement, voter purging, poll worker misconduct, voter machines, and accessibility. The hotline regularly operates on weekdays from 9:00am-6:00pm EST/EDT, and expands to both weekdays and weekends from 9:00am-9:00pm EST/EDT starting in October during election years.

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 month ago

So for the first time we don’t get lumped in with the yanks, we get lumped in with the Brits instead???

We just can’t win.

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 month ago

This is some bullshit, I can’t even lend a hand

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

George Carlin nailed it as always.

16
submitted 2 months ago by nixx@lemmy.ca to c/hamilton@lemmy.ca
58
submitted 2 months ago by nixx@lemmy.ca to c/hamilton@lemmy.ca
[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago
5
submitted 2 months ago by nixx@lemmy.ca to c/hamilton@lemmy.ca
[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago

You are all missing the point.

Trees are not a "problem", but rather an untapped resource.

I mean look at them, millions, nah billions of them just sitting there, none of them are generating a penny for our billionaires.

Imagine what our glorious billionaires can do if we allow them to just chop down all those trees? Think of all the beautiful toiler paper for our collective asses, as well as the billion of bibles (including a copy of the constitution) that they can sell to us for the low low price of $65.

And as an added benefit, getting rid of all those trees will also eliminate the problem of forest fires. You can't have those without forests in the first place.

To be sure, some forests will need to be left alone, specially those close to residential areas, but not for the reasons that you think.

We need those forests to actually burn down, hopefully taking down those houses next to them. Why? Think about it. If all those houses burn down then we can use those trees we chopped down elsewhere to build new houses, a BOOM for the construction billionaires. And also, it means that houses next to those forest that can accidentally burn down will have to have an increase in their insurance premium, we can even make it so that forests close to houses have a private company to fight forest fires, think of all the benefits for billionaires.

Once you start thinking money, it all makes sense

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Canadian company that owns several supermarket chains as well as pharmacies and other assets that have been caught multiple times raising prices because they can.

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago

Try 35 years

Somehow I’m a “Unix Wizard” because I know how to read log files?

Oh, and now I’m DevOps because I pythoned my way out of wet paper bag.

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

Scumbag Steve

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/scumbag-steve

Thanks for reminding me how old I am

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 49 points 9 months ago

Jesus save us from your followers.

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

DHCP?

Your old host registered an fqdn and did mnt remove it, then the new host registered the same ip to a different fqdn.

It happens

I have no idea what you are using for dhcp/dns but start by looking there

[-] nixx@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Remember why CentOS (and WhiteBox) came to exist?

This is not the first time RedHat pulls that stunt, this is the reason I stick to pure Debian.

I like SUSE, but I’m hesitant of relying on another commercial entity although business requires it.

For now Deb and Ian are the safest bet and my daily driver since 2002, they have not let me down.

view more: next ›

nixx

joined 1 year ago