They could easily make more money with the same image by limiting how much revenue goes to the charities. You can choose to not give them anything.
I'm not saying they aren't in it for the money. Most people need to make money to survive. But I think it's disingenuous to say they don't care at all. I think they do good and I feel many others agree.
A corporate marketing tool that costs such a large portion of your revenue is an inefficient tool. There must be some other value in it for them.
Not anymore. Now available in the US.
That's a horrendous comparison. You could have had an arguable point if other countries weren't already doing it.
Introverts are not by definition antisocial though they can be. They just spend energy to be social. A shut-in is likely an introvert. An introvert doesn't have to be a shut-in. I don't know the mass public mistake where folks assume introverts are the same as people who don't like social interaction. So an introvert can easily enjoy socializing in NYC and seeing people. It just uses energy.
That being said, if you're not going to leave your apartment, choosing a place that's super expensive due to all the things you need to leave your apartment for, you're not making a good choice.
Eh, I dunno how I feel about simplyfing communism to be representative of all leftist beliefs. Moreover, it's still less cringe than spelling out how an acronym sounds. This isn't elementary school.
If copyright law can work against the individual, it should work against the corporation as well. We can't only enforce it against the little people. Enforce it for all or for none.
They work because they're family, right? Not for money.
I mean, if you want updates or fixes for bugs that's on work that occurred after you paid? Or are you suggesting we go back to the old model of super expensive software that gets sunsetted in a few years anyway?
Development costs money. When you buy an app, development doesn't stop. What kind of nonsense are you peddling here? How do you have such a rudimentary understanding of work and effort and how they all cost money?
Your criticism is nonsensical. It's literally criticizing the purpose of the project.
Your "opinion" exposes you don't understand what antifascists are. Antifa is not a group. It literally is just an abbreviated form of the word antifascist. "Antifa" doesn't do anything. It has no form or organization. It's just an idea. It's like saying socialist or conservative.
It's interesting that you're exercising your right to tell people to stop exercising theirs....
What did they convert to? I can't tell if this is a joke I just don't understand or what