[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

In my country for administrative cases with short deadlines courts have fast tracks. So in such a case the court probably wouldn't issue any final judgement but could order everyone involved to stop further committing potentially illegal actions.

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

How dare people use games for recreation! Why would they not think about the shareholders!

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 231 points 1 month ago

When you use Celsius from birth 41C does make you say FORTY ONE DEGREES?!!!

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

no war

Greenland is a super strategic place in the Northern Atlantic "theatre"

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 120 points 2 months ago

Try reading some current information on it.

Oh no no no, we don't play that game here. If you're trying to convince someone of your argument, the burden of providing reputable and scientifically accurate evidence is on YOU and you only.

And only if the other side won't accept scientific evidence then you can blame them.

I'm not saying cats can't be vegan but to the best of my knowledge their diet must be meat based. As it is you who are trying to convince me (and others) cats can be vegan, it is also you who must provide the evidence.

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

It's the tragedy of our times that advocating for basic human rights is somehow "leftist"

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 72 points 5 months ago

And capitalistic mass production with no respect for natural resources, aka intensive farming. Plants are grown in huge monocultures with little to no genetic diversity thus making them prone to what would naturally be limited issues like unfavourable weather or diseases

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 99 points 5 months ago

Maybe, if reviewers were paid for their job they could actually focus on reading the paper and those things wouldn't slide. But then Elsevier shareholders could only buy one yacht a year instead of two and that would be a nightmare...

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Cat was probably thinking: "Damn those humans, I have to do all the cleaning myself"

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 100 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Most people mention the costs of owning aircraft vs a sim, but there's another possible reason: health. People come in different shapes and forms and not everyone who loves aviation is able to get II or even III medical class. So flight simulation is their only option to be a "pilot".

I mean, on VATSIM (popular aviation simulation network) there's a group of visually impaired people who have made a special interface so they can fly an aircraft even though they can't see!

Simulation (of any kind) gives many people what they can't get in any other way. And as with any other hobby, as long as it's not damaging to other aspects of your life, let people enjoy what they want

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago

Okay, so I get the reason why NOWADAYS IRS can't tell you how much taxes you owe is lobbying. But how did it work BEFORE computers? Did you file your forms and IRS agents checked them one by one, and it was just most efficient to check taxes instead of calculating them? How did we get to the situation where the IRS checks the taxes instead of calculating them? I'm genuinely curious, because that's a recurring theme worldwide.

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Does YouTube pay their content creators properly? No, they have to rely on external partnerships. Does YouTube help their creators solve issues with greedy companies making copyright claims on not their content? No, they close channels because of such claims and strip creators of income they deserve. Does YouTube keep their platform secure to protect its creators? No, hackers managed to get access to the biggest channels on the platform despite YouTube being aware of the issues for months. Does YouTube at least use their knowledge from spying its users to stop bots posting comments? No, bot comments are all over the place. And I could go like that for ages...

The fact is YouTube is a shitty platform and people use it because they have to not because they want to. Because they have a fucking monopoly! People are paying thousands of dollars directly to content creators through platforms like Patreon, because they like the content. But people are not willing to support financially the platform that openly don't give a fuck about their users and creators (which are the only reason this platform exists) and care only about their shareholders. Because why would they pay to make the rich richer while content creators struggle to earn money for rent!

view more: next ›

repungnant_canary

joined 1 year ago