[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 2 months ago

They can. Servers that are delisted or go offline are removed from the counts.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 2 months ago

Well, this is certainly a lot less exciting than what I first thought.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 2 months ago

it might be the Brazilian equivalent to MAGA that is currently mass-migrating to Bluesky.

actually, the opposite. The MAGA types are doing whatever they can to continue sucking on Elon's balls. It's journos and normies who are moving to Bluesky.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 3 months ago

There are some RSS readers that will download the actual URL and apply "reader mode" on the page to present the full article. I think FreshRSS has such a plugin.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 15 points 7 months ago

Do you mean exclusive/tiered access to certain rooms only for subscribers?

If you are telling me that such a thing doesn't exist for Matrix already, you just gave me a perfect thing to offer on communick

[-] rglullis@communick.news 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not that I hold the Lemmy devs in particular high regard, but unless OP is cutting them a check every month enough to pay their full time salaries, I really don't think that he should be expecting anything just because he faced an issue that was difficult, but (a) not specific to the developers but the admins of the instance and (b) ultimately solvable.

I also think that this is not a reason to justify a whole fork or even a fully adversarial position. Yeah, tooling for moderation and instance management is lacking, but these can be built on top of the existing codebase. If my fediverser tool does that for user authentication and account management, it could also be extended for content moderation and provide granular access for staff.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 15 points 8 months ago

Not to diss an open source project, but Faircamp is "just" a static site generator for artists that want to showcase their music. It has no storefront, can no communicate with customers, etc. People need a lot more than a nice-looking playlist .

If you are considering an alternative for Bandcamp, may I contact you? I am working on something that I hope can both be useful for artists looking for a mor stable income stream and music listeners who want an alternative to Spotify.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 9 months ago

Why bother with BlueSky over Mastodon?

Bluesky's model of federation fixes the whole "if my instance goes down I lose everything".

Your Identity and your data is portable, which means that each server on Bluesky is "merely" a service provider.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 11 months ago

For that, we should start bringing our own private keys to the server, instead of trusting the server to control everything.

And if we start doing that, pretty soon we will end up asking ourselves why do we need the server in the first place, and we will evolve to something like what nostr is doing.

I'm all for it.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Their goal is to lure (probably former reddit or twitter) users to Threads

Their goal is to take users from Twitter, and by doing that they are opening the opportunity to get users from Twitter to the Fediverse.

There has to be at least one major news org who is looking at this and thinking "well, if Threads does bring a few hundred million people to the Fediverse, we'll be able to drop Twitter and integrate our CMS with the Fediverse like Wordpress."

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 1 year ago

People want to be where people are.

This logic only applies in centralized platforms. In the case of the Fediverse, people are everywhere and anywhere.

[-] rglullis@communick.news 14 points 1 year ago

I am calling for the professionalization of the fediverse since December of last year. The donation-based and "pay-what-you-want" systems that the most popular instances are adopting are not sustainable and they are not fair.

Paying for servers is the least of the problems. Dealing with hundreds of thousands of users who are freeriding on the donations from some generous minority is. The income from an instance might grow linearly with the number of users, but the amount of issues grows exponentially because of the potential number of interactions.

Instead of these handful of servers who are concentrating the majority of users, we should be aiming at having an explosion of smaller instances who have a well defined, limited size and where every members contributes, no matter how little. When everyone contributes, then everyone feels responsible and the burden gets to be shared among all. When a handful of people give and the majority does not reciprocate, we get these cases of people feeling burn out and isolated.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

rglullis

joined 1 year ago