[-] Sal@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

That's an error I had not seen before, but I also just encountered with this specific post. I will investigate, thanks.

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

In the case of tempeh keeping the right ambient temperature (~30) and adding a bit of vinegar to the beans is the best way I have experienced to make it grow fast and healthy. The CO2 I only measure to check for stale air. The tempeh fungus breathes in oxygen and exhales CO2, and if you have a lot of tempeh in a small incubator the CO2 can get too high.

In some techniques for mushroom growing, the mycelium is grown inside of a tub. The fungus exhales CO2 into the closed tub and inhibits this high CO2 condition inhibits fruiting. The fruiting stage can be stimulated by using a fan to push out the CO2. In the case of tempeh one can surround the tempeh with fresh air to stimulate the tempeh to produce spores, which can then be ground with white rice to create a powder to inoculate a lot more tempeh.

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago

Thank you being around, bringing this nice community here, and helping with the federation!! 😁

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

🥳 Muchas gracias!

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

Thank you for the positivity 💚 I wholeheartedly agree!

Drama and negativity drives engagement, and this form of engagement can easily trigger a feedback loop in which negativity keeps piling on and voices of support are practically muted.

We are participating in an open source project that has some very ambitious goals. Things can be messy, mistakes happen, there are risks, and people have many different opinions and moods. Heated discussions can be a healthy part of the process. But, once the dust is allowed to settle for a bit, it is good to remember that we are humans and that we are here because we have some shared goals.

I think the majority of people around here are kind and have a positive outlook, but perhaps it is more motivating to speak out when we have negative comments than positive ones. So, thank you for taking the time to write this positive message!

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

Do you see a random nickname from a stranger, or a nickname of an account that was previously logged into using the same computer?

What is an open account sharing channel?

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 8 points 11 months ago

Thank you for your hard work!!

I appreciate that you going through this test period. I hope it all goes smoothly and that at least a few hairs remain on your heads by the end of this week. Good luck!

23
submitted 1 year ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/plantid@mander.xyz

There were a few of these plants next to each other, but not all of them had this bright purple coloration. I suppose there might be an acidic spot by the roots, but I'm not sure.

19
submitted 1 year ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/plantid@mander.xyz

From the Netherlands

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Well then, it is settled (Mattingly, 2014).

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are all part of the global cabal of pedo academics who make up lies for the NWO

Well, do you have any anecdotal evidence to substantiate this claim?

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

My girlfriend kept complaining about losing her hearts on Duolingo and I was very confused as I never had any "hearts" during regular lessons. Eventually I found out that since I had created a classroom while exploring the site, I was given access to a teacher version of Duolingo - which is basically a free premium version 😅

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Considering the context in which I'm encountering the term "UAP", and the Wiki page I get to if I look up "unidentified aerial phenomena", I worry their mission to get away from the automatic link to extraterrestrials may not be very successful!

16
....UAPs? (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Sal@mander.xyz to c/casualconversation@lemmy.world

A few times in the last two or three days I heard the term "unidentified aerial phenomena", abbreviated as "UAP", being used by the US government and media to refer to what mere mortals used to call "UFOs", or, better yet, "maybe aliens".

Is this a new term? Never heard it being used before. I don't like it more than UFO, and it doesn't sound much more technically correct to me. Sure, maybe the object is not 'flying'... but, on that same vein, is it really an 'aerial phenomenon'? Whatever that means....

Is this like a search-engine optimization type thing, where they change the term a little bit to separate their new press releases from the older literature?

So, what's up with 'UAPs'? (example article)

3
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Sal@mander.xyz to c/plantid@mander.xyz
1
submitted 1 year ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/plantid@mander.xyz
1
submitted 1 year ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/plantid@mander.xyz
42
submitted 2 years ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
40
submitted 2 years ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
3
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Sal@mander.xyz to c/lifehacks@lemmy.ml

I just figured this out and it is so convenient. I will show by example. I am using Firefox, but other browsers might work the same way.

(1) Go to lemmy.ml

(2) Ctrl+D, then enter to save as a bookmark

(3) Ctrl+shift+O to open the bookmark settings

(4) Select the lemmy bookmark that you just created

(5) At the bottom of the menu, you can set a Keyword. Write the letter "l".

(6) Close the menu

You can now type "Ctrl+L" to jump to the navigation bar, then type "l", enter.

You can create single or few-letter keywords for the sites that you visit often.

Bonus related tip: In the browser preferences, under "search", you can define a keword for specific search engines. For example, if you set wikipedia to "@w", you can then search directly from the navigation bar by typing "@w whatever"

0
submitted 2 years ago by Sal@mander.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I would like to make a community dedicated to posting interesting science questions that have been asked and answered in other sites.

The post would be a copy of the question and the comments would be copies of the answers that were found to be interesting - always with the username attribution and the link to the original post.

With this format, users would not need to leave the site, and it is easy to discuss the answers directly in the comments.

But I have my doubts about whether this is appropriate, as I think that it might be copyright infringement.

So, what do people in Lemmy think? Would this format be blatant theft and wrong? Perfectly reasonable? Somewhere in between?

1
view more: ‹ prev next ›

Sal

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF