[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 37 points 3 months ago

"ready to support" is such a nothingburger of a phrase

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 44 points 5 months ago

Newsmega doesn’t really talk about Belgium, so if people are interested I can post more.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 46 points 5 months ago

The Corbyn party is still hypothetical, nothing has been formalised yet. The 15% is purely based on his name recognition / hate for other parties. I assume when they create an actual program and campaign the polling would change a lot

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 49 points 7 months ago

do you actually think that there are no ukranians that speak russian?

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

That is the core of libertarian philosophy

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

agreed. cheating wasn't invented yesterday

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

Dems had many opportunities to oppose an abortion ban. Before RvW was overturned and after.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

At least you balance Russia doomerism with China doomerism

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

how is capital flight the unions fault

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Can you please chill with the dramatic doomerism about Russia.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

Interestingly, GDR was getting quite progressive on lgbt issues around 1989. In the USSR, some gay rights groups were formed around the same time. The problem with perestroika and glasnost was that reactionary currents/topics/speech far outweighed any progressive movements.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

Maybe a bit of both? I wouldn’t underestimate the reactionary ideology part though. After 1991, "traditional values" have firmly replaced socialism to explain why Russia is better than the west. Since the country was brutally transitioning to capitalism, there had to be an ideological reasoning for the suffering (blaming marginalized people of course). The Orthodox Church had a lot of influence on it, as well as patriarchal criminal gangs that were very prominent in the 90s and very connected to the ruling class. So it’s not like the people on top are disconnected from the reactionary elements, they came to power through them and continue to benefit from it.

Is there a part that doesn’t care? Maybe. There are quite a few oligarchs who have permanent residencies in europe, or send their kids to study there. But to me it is kinda like Republicans sending kids to Ivy League but then saying that they teach Marxism or something. Benefiting from privilege doesn’t necessarily mean than you’re not culturally conservative.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

starkillerfish

joined 2 years ago