Ok now where does this fit on my red string chart that links david gerard to X Æ A-Xii/Techno Mechanicus

@titotal@awful.systems mentioned!!!

For me, it's the complete non-mention of uterus-owning people*, as if they are just a means to the end.

*I couldn't come up with a gender-inclusive term for this that didn't make me sound like a monster so apologies

A rat scoring an own goal shouldn't be surprising, and a rat, especially ZMD, not understanding how to edit should also not be surprising.

Hobbes👏doesn’t👏miss👏

https://youtu.be/O9YL04v-J5U Bill burr bit here.

My bad, Burr doesn’t suggest a roids olympics.

tbh, weird energy coming from your responses, I am now disengaging.

from now on, my new bit is: I’m gonna prove how current yud tweet is a joke. Not that anyone needed more reasons to not take him seriously, of course. Just clowning on him and his inability to consciously produce humor for a lil’ fun.

In this case: Quoting an exact percentage for a made up quantity is clearly a reference to the “32.33, repeating of course” line from the leeroy jenkins video which was later revealed as a hoax, so by the transitive property, this twitter thread is also a hoax. Quite a clever, humorous, and timely meme reference. Bravo Dr. Yud

This is Yud joking again. He famously hates brevity.

Oof, guess I must reread the sequences 10 times as penance. (JK never have, never will.)

The article vacillates between saying sometimes identifying bad faith is good, actually, and trying to move the goal posts so everyone is still acting in good faith. Just about as good self-editing that I’d expect from LW.

Is there a statistical analysis that could prove (or disprove) that GrAImes (hey grimes, you can have that for free) is generated from her tweets? In any case, this is hilarious.