17
submitted 11 months ago by pja@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

Maria Farrell rips into the SV CEO archetype for us.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 months ago

Idk if this is it. Most of their horrible traits are things actively encouraged and selected for by capitalism. It's not like this attitude is unique to this age, their power is remarkable but we've had similar shit at least since industrialisation.

Pathologising political failures seems unhelpful? In a different environment they'd just be kinda annoying braggarts or something.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 11 months ago

Absolutely agree. Blaming individual ideology implies we need new individuals. What we actually need is structural change.

The issue is capitalism. SV ideology is just capitalism. Capitalism doesn’t go away by getting rid of a few people at the top.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 11 months ago

Counterpoint to all this is: at the very least this might help move the needle on some folks who don’t see things this way yet.

[-] JohnBierce@awful.systems 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah, there's absolutely a place for arguments that aren't full-bore "capitalism is evil, forward the revolution!" Some people need to be eased into that space, and articles like this, that show how fundamentally stupid and terrible Musk and company are, are a great way to get people to start asking HOW dingbats like that got power. And it's not the longest journey from there to questioning whether something is wrong with the system itself.

(There are failure states, of course- namely, reinforcing the neoliberal idea that if you just put better people in charge of a system, it will work better. But that's a question of execution, not of tactical validity.)

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 11 months ago
[-] JohnBierce@awful.systems 6 points 11 months ago

Goddamnit I wish I'd intended that pun

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

ehhh I hear you, but pathologising them seems to run the risk of like the femicide and rape conversations where people use the idea of certain men being "monsters" to avoid critically examining their friends and loved ones.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 11 months ago

asshole personality disorder, inexplicably absent from both DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

979 readers
94 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS