CEOs just make decisions that anyone can make

LMK when your company hits a billion dollars in revenue and we'll see how easy the job is.

I believe there must be some kind of genetic component for this to be true. For example, I could have a War on Communism, where I want to destroy all communists. These communists could be any race or nationality, so I would not call this a genocide. I would say that most wars are typically between nation states, and nation states tend to have large groups of citizens with common genetics, so there is often overlap.

No, genocide has a specific meaning -- the wholesale destruction of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group. If someone holds up a bank and shoots two people, that's probably not genocide. If I invade a country and 200,000 civilians from that country die, that probably is genocide.

WW2 would be considered genocidal for their war against the Nazi party, no?

Yes.

which will be enabled by us having more time to do our own stuff

You may be underestimating the laziness of the average consumer. I don't think people are going to use 1 extra day a week to start refining their own gas, making their own clothes or raising their own cattle.

In this scenario, what are you doing to earn the $20?

I own the equipment that produces the widgets. I pay the insurance policy that covers Joe getting injured at work. I pay for distribution and marketing of the widgets. If Joe feels like taking on all these responsibilities, he is free to quit his job and start a competing widget manufacturer.

So, basically the employees would have to cram their same workload into 20% less time for this to work. (without changing prices)

The entry points are closed? Not one person crosses the border from Mexico to the US each day?

I fail to see how that legal process involves almost drowning in a river or becoming entangled in razor wire. We are talking about separate groups of people: some requesting asylum the LEGAL way and others taking a chance and YOLOing across the border.

Maybe it's unfair their own country isn't helping them. Again, if you feel our rules are unfair there are mechanisms to change them. Ignoring them is not the proper approach.

Why is syphilis seen as infectious and bad, but herpes is fine?

Be aware that depending on your workload and/or deployment processes, OpenBSD may or may not be a better choice. For example, OpenBSD has a very secure default install, but containerization tools like Docker are not available. Additionally, if you require specialized hardware (e.g., a specific network card), OpenBSD may not have the required drivers available. However, if you prioritize security and want a system that is less prone to attacks and malware, OpenBSD could be a good option for you. Here's a checklist of things to consider before making the switch:

• Check whether all necessary hardware and software are supported by OpenBSD.
• Make sure you have a backup plan in case something goes wrong during the migration process.
• Get familiar with the OpenBSD user interface and commands to ensure smooth transition.
• Back up all important data and settings before the migration.
• Update your software sources to ensure you have access to the latest stable versions of software packages.
• Prepare yourself with the knowledge of how to handle any issues that might come up during the migration process.
• Test the system thoroughly after the migration to ensure everything is working as expected.

Overall, switching to OpenBSD can be a rewarding experience if you take the necessary precautions and prepare yourself well. Good luck with your migration! Let me know if you need further assistance or have any other questions related to OpenBSD or Linux operating systems.