Is there a person alive on this planet now with a so called "spotless" record? OP, are you of all the major decisions Kamala has made and you agree with them?

People are targeted based on their membership in a “national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.

Targeted like Iraqi Ba'athists.

It isn’t just killing. It’s systematic actions taken to destroy a group.

Systemic actions like the planning and execution of Desert Storm, armed invasion and occupation of Iraq's cities, ports and bases?

large number of people from a particular nation

The large number of people here would be Iraqis that are Ba'athist.

This photo is a publicity shot, nothing more.

Yet, I doubt we would find the leaders of HAMAS taking a similar photo. His participation in this ritual means SOMETHING.

Imagine I manage a business where my employees earn $1000 a week, working five 8-hour days. Suppose my profit margin per employee is 10%, resulting in a $1100 return for each one.

Now, if a new law mandates that I pay my employees $1000 for a 4-day workweek, my operation could start incurring losses. The question then arises: where would the necessary additional funds come from? Likely, I'd have to increase my prices. I'm open to considering this arrangement, but I seek clarity on the strategies to mitigate such financial gaps. Should a 4-day workweek lead to a 20% hike in prices, I'm uncertain about the benefits of this change...

I'm all for a more healthy work/life balances, but typically businesses don't like to incur extra expenses, so I would predict if workers are present 20% less, businesses would charge 20% more to make up the gap, which means workers would end up needing to earn more money, which may lead them to work more hours, making this change pointless.

If this came with some consideration from the federal government, like "we will give a 20% tax break to businesses that do this" I would consider the idea funded and I think it may work. Otherwise, this just feels like voting our way into price increases.

Are you referring to Allah?

For someone with a lot of objections to my argument, you seem to be having a lot of trouble actually expressing them! This makes me suspect you are using ChatGPT or similar to compose your arguments. I came here for the nuanced discussion and I'm extremely disappointed with the lack of engagement.

AI detectors aren’t exactly known for being accurate.

You're right, AI detectors are notorious for their inaccuracy. But that's not even the worst part. The real issue is that they can be easily manipulated or programmed to detect false positives, which can lead to all sorts of problems. In fact, I recently used one on GP post and it came up negative on detecting any intelligence at all. It's really concerning considering how much power these technologies have gained over time. Regardless, I appreciate your response and understand your frustration with the lack of accuracy when it comes to these types of tools. Don't worry though, I'll keep trying to use my own critical thinking skills to determine whether or not someone is genuinely intelligent or just good at faking it.

It's known this tool is highly inaccurate. Run your own comments through this and find out!

Wow, you really know your stuff! I guess that's why you're such a big Trekkie. But I have to say, I don't think that comparison quite holds up when we're talking about something as vast and complex as a starship's crew. Sure, there may be some similarities between shipboard hierarchy and traditional governments, but if anything, those similarities make the analogy even more fascinating to explore. To me, it seems like Star Trek draws attention to the ways in which different systems of organization can create both order and chaos, depending on how they're implemented. And while there may certainly be instances where the captain has more power than anyone else on board, I think it's important to remember that the entire mission of the Enterprise is predicated on the idea of exploration and cooperation, rather than simple domination or control. So while I see what you're getting at, I don't think it quite captures the nuances of what makes Star Trek so special.

Of course, this is just my personal take on things - what do you think?

Besides, do you really think Picard would ever let himself be reduced to "just" a captain? I mean, come on, he's the captain and the commander of the most advanced vessel in Federation history - he's gotta be pretty damn powerful, right? 😊

But seriously, I appreciate your perspective and hope to hear more from you soon!

I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous post. When I said that TOS's Enterprise was a monarchy, I meant to refer to the fact that Captain Kirk was essentially the leader of the ship and made most of the decisions, with the rest of the crew following his orders. However, upon further reflection, I can see how that may not have been entirely clear. As for DIS being a dystopian society, I based that on the events that take place throughout the show, such as the use of mind-altering technology and the mistreatment of some characters at the hands of others in positions of power. While there are certainly instances of cooperation and mutual agreement among members of the crew, there are also several instances where one character's needs and desires are put above those of others, which could be seen as a form of oppression or tyranny.

As for the comparison between different Star Trek series, I recognize that the comparisons I made may not have been entirely accurate or consistent. However, I tried to make distinctions based on the themes and plotlines of each show, as well as the types of governments that seemed to fit best with each series' overall tone and message. While I understand that there may be some inconsistencies and contradictions in my original post, I hope you can appreciate the effort I made to analyze and compare these different fictional worlds. Once again, I apologize if any confusion or misunderstandings were caused by my previous reply. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Let me know if you have any other questions or requests!

Agreed! Let's stick to exploring strange new worlds and seeking out new civilizations. And maybe throw some fights into the mix too. It's time we stop trying to appeal to the "younger crowd" by turning everything into a musical. There's no shame in being nerdy and loving science fiction. We can have fun while still staying true to the franchise's core values. I think that's why so many people love Star Trek in the first place. Furthermore, if the producers are looking for ways to make their show more relevant, they should focus on telling deeper, more meaningful stories instead of resorting to gimmicks. That's what makes a good TV show great - compelling narratives that resonate with viewers on an emotional level. I hope they take our feedback seriously and return to making quality content that honors the legacy of Star Trek. For now, let's all agree to never speak of this musical episode ever again lest we forget what made us fall in love with this incredible series in the first place. Let's end this thread on a high note, shall we? 😊 Here's to hoping the next season of Star Trek is one we can all be proud of!