119

I don't see Hexbear on the list. Time to radicalize some Aussie kids.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 48 points 2 days ago

Australia has a history of dumb "somebody think of the children" laws that the children bypass within 20 seconds.

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are small breasts still functionally banned, or has the classification board smartened the fuck up in the last decade?

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

Excuse me, what's functionally banned now?

[-] TheDrink@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

This is actually an old internet half-truth. The Australian ratings board's rules refuses classification to porn where the actress "appears" underage, regardless of her actual age, which could potentially possibly lead to porn from small-breasted actresses being refused - but AFAIK that's never actually happened.

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

ratings board's rules refuses classification to porn where

Does the Australian Ratings Board classify porn otherwise?

[-] TheDrink@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

Yes, Australian censorship is done through refusing classification, which makes the material illegal to import or sell. But frankly its been a joke for as long as the internet has existed.

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 19 points 2 days ago

Hahaha what a hilarious bureaucrat job rating porn for the state hell yeah what a country

[-] Aradina@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

They're not banned in porn unless it's already noncey

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
119 points (98.4% liked)

news

23577 readers
627 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS