45
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 weeks ago

Modlogs are public, everyone can see why you were banned.

Also no ml would disagree with that, here's Lenin explaining the difference between a capitalist democracy and a workers democracy.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone can see why the mod said they were banned. If you believe the mod logs, I was banned from 196 for "supporting genocide"

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you believe in modlogs, then drag was banned from !politicalmemes@lemmy.world for "trolling", which is what a trans person explaining their pronouns is.

[-] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

To be fair, to me (a 30-something gay dude from EU) what you posted here in the screenshot looks like taking a piss and trolling.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 3 weeks ago

Trolls who pretend to be trans are only threatening if you feel threatened by trans people. When you react with hostility, you feed and empower them. When you restrict the rights of trans people under the suspicion a troll might use those rights, the trolls win.

If you practice radical acceptance and only draw the line at causing harm to other people, then trolls can't do anything bad to you.

Drag isn't a troll, but drag is bewildered at the logic that we should stop trolls by doing exactly what they want. That's never going to work. You're just gonna end up hurting real trans people like drag. And you're gonna send a message to other queer people that if they step one inch out of line, you'll be ready to call them a troll too. Who on earth does that actually help?

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 weeks ago

No, drag's name is Dragon Rider.

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

Probably shouldn't support genocide then ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

I would love for you to find the comment where I did that

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Which is why you can see them do it exactly as stated. "American propaganda" lol.

Have fun hanging around people who ban people for disagreeing with the party line of a dead ideology that had its corpse cannibalized by fascists. That will surely lead to the second revolution.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Can you point at me where it says you were banned for "American propaganda"? I tried ctrl+f "propaganda" to see what you were saying that got you banned and nothing came up.

Nobody is going to disagree that a bourgeois democracy is a democracy, only that bourgeois democracies represent the people instead of bourgeoisie.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That'd be the part where they hid the actual comments and mod responses on all the .ml communities. Interesting that it rewrites the history when they decide to undo it, I hadn't actually noticed it expired.

So weird and uncharacteristic of M-Ls to do something shitty and then delete the records and then lie about the cause because it makes them look bad...

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

.world communities do the same thing, just banning someone for "misinformation" looks much less suspicious than showing posts of me linking people the Wikipedia article on Tienanmen Square and describing what the article said and surrounding context instead of joining the china-bad circle-jerk.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There's a pretty big difference between arguing the details of something as controversial as Tianamen and instance banning anyone that doesn't use the Party-approved definition of democracy even though they clearly referred to a specific form of it.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
45 points (60.6% liked)

memes

10557 readers
2366 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS