629
submitted 1 year ago by krolden@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 88 points 1 year ago

bOtH sIdEs

This is why libs get clowned on so hard. You claim to support "the only viable left leaning political party", and yet you're kneecapping large swaths of people on the ground engaging in direct action advancing left leaning values. Remember, segregation wasn't ended because black people voted, blood was spilt in the streets. Same with the LGBT community, see the stonewall uprising, aka, the first pride parade.

I don't care how you vote, but if you can't see the difference between an anarchist engaging in direct action against an oppressive state and fascists doing hate crimes; well, I'd say it's time to get off your high horse and do a little introspection.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

yet you're kneecapping large swaths of people on the ground engaging in direct action advancing left leaning values

Direct action is meaningless if you're hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power. It doesn't matter how many lit memes anarchists and communists share on social media and how much they horn on about "direct action," this is a democracy and without votes going to candidates who can win, it is ultimately meaningless.

You want me to do some introspection? I did. I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Direct action is meaningless if you're hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power.

Spoken like someone who's never done organizing, participated in protests or any other direct action. You're a keyboard warrior who's probably never even interacted with a socialist IRL.

this is a democracy and without votes going to candidates who can win, it is ultimately meaningless.

Not a democracy and also I already gave 2 examples showing the contrary.

I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

No need to be a condescending dick. I'm also guessing I'm older than you, not that it's relevant.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I've participated in dozens of protests. Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

No need to be a condescending dick.

If you don't want someone to take offense at what you write, don't smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 53 points 1 year ago

Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

Right... I'm not sure why you think I'm not in favor of organized resistance.

If you don't want someone to take offense at what you write, don't smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

You were doing a "both sides" between anarchists and fascists, eerily similar to Trump, while claiming to be "left leaning". I think my response was warranted, if not understated. But frankly, that's plain ignorant.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] epicspongee@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

I’ve participated in dozens of protests. Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

Protests !== organizing. Organizing achieves political change. Protest does not. Leftists know how to organize, liberals do not.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If liberals don't know how to organize and leftists do, why does the Democratic party dominate elections

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of COINTELPRO?

[-] StalinwasaGryffindor@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Because leftists understand that actual progress doesn’t come from voting?

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of capitalism?

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Liberals don't know how to organize precisely because the Democratic party dominates the elections. No need to organize when the organization already exists. All they need to do is to "vote blue no matter who".

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

This is unnecessary aggro, and you are the only one here making sweeping assumptions.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Nah, the other fellow is too

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago

I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward.

Did you actually do any studying about socialism during this phase, or is this the "Che Guevara T-Shirt" socialism I've heard so much about?

[-] Addfwyn@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

We both know it wasn't even Che Guevara T-Shirt socialism. It was definitely "I think the nordic model is pretty cool" socialism.

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Direct action is meaningless if you're hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power

The US isn't a democracy, you can't build coalitions with people who want to destroy everything you stand for, direct action got George Floyd justice not votes, and the people you back turned around and decided to fund the police to record levels, it's a war not an electoral campaign

I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

Do you know how to communicate in anything other than thought terminating clichés?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

The Democrats have significant political power how's that working out?

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is delusional. Direct action absolutely has its place, but all the things you mentioned were ultimately won at the ballot box. As it should be. Don't let a childish revolution fetish blind you to what constitutes a viable framework for lasting progress.

Edit - "Has." As in he has a ball. Or she has a textbook.

[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 58 points 1 year ago

It's funny how libs think they can tell me when direct action is necessary, and it's always in the past tense, never in the present.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

It's funny when ML thinks they are the only leftists

[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 45 points 1 year ago

Not an ML. And certainly don't think I'm the only leftist. Lots of different types of leftists, many I disagree with. But unless you're opposed to capitalism, then you're a liberal, not a leftist.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Liberals aren't leftists, but there's a whole world of political thought to the left of liberals.

[-] Addfwyn@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

I am a ML and everything I have seen of Jenkem's posting here makes me think they are probably a leftist.

We probably don't agree on everything, but they're no liberal.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Hey now. Anarchists and Maoists and a bunch of others are leftists too.

Liberals are not.

[-] epicspongee@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

Can you define direct action for me? What do you think it is?

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Minneapolis May 28, 2020

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
629 points (80.3% liked)

Memes

45739 readers
545 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS