89
James Woods owns so many homes that he had four just in Rhode Island, in addition to "investment properties"
(www.providencejournal.com)
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
When ever Marxists tell me that these wealthy celebrities (actors, athletes etc.) are working class because they are selling their labour, I remind them that their obscene wealth means they own multiple properties (that they rent out, like Killer Mike and Dave Chapelle), businesses and investments.
class is not a bright-line category, what matters is the dominant aspect of his relationship to ~~capital~~ the means of production, which is pretty clearly his investments and not his acting compensation. he could stop acting right now
—by zhenli真理
someone find the lathe
But seriously, videodrome is the only thing worth watching that he's heavily featured in
he was also the fed prick in GTA:SA
He is a landlord that also does a real job
My understanding of class is it's defined by your relationship to capital. A shareholder or landlord could do labour, but that doesn't make them working class
It's just buying your way into the owning class. Anyone can do it if they obtain obscene amounts of wealth.
You can it with even a moderate level of wealth
I wouldn't say they're working class, but they're not ruling elites, at least not all of them have businesses.
They're not necessarily haute bourgeois but they're likely best viewed as petit bourgeois at best.