452
submitted 10 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

More humane like Nazi-America, or more humane like Warcrimes-Russia? Description unclear, please clarify.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 38 points 10 months ago

More humane like the best of us wish to be and the majority of us never will be

[-] guy@piefed.social 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More humane as in respecting human rights I suppose

[-] kugel7c@feddit.org -4 points 10 months ago

Is there a state that is not disrespecting human rights ? I for one haven't heard of any.

[-] guy@piefed.social 6 points 10 months ago

Degrees in hell maybe.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

To clarify, what you're doing is "what-aboutism". Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

They weren't just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn't deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn't whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

There's a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

You don't at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean I could see how you could get that but it's not how I read it. I read it as they are not humane enough to effectively collaborate with.

I mean, listen, America is a huge hypocrisy so I'm not saying people aren't doing that, I guess I just read it more literally.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

It's a bad take either way, and that interpretation makes way less sense. The reason we don't collaborate with China is geopolitical, and has nothing to do with ethics or China being too inhumane to effectively collaborate with (whatever that means).

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean, I'm aware of the actual reason, I've never argued that lol.

[-] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

China could stand to be more humane, but it wouldn't make the US cooperate with them.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Honestly China might start looking moderate compared to what I expect our new Dear Leader to do in the coming years.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Try to read up and understand what whataboutism means. Because you clearly didn't get the point of my comment.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You brought up other societies as compared them to us. It's the definition of what-aboutism, just read up on it again to make sure.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
452 points (97.3% liked)

Science

5566 readers
177 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS