219
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
219 points (99.5% liked)
news
23746 readers
805 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, Republicans could theoretically pass this since they control house and Senate...we're fudged
They would have to end the filibuster in the Senate to do so, I assume. Not saying that they won't -- it was always a cope for Democrats to not do so.
They won't hesitate to do that for their pet issue.
I dunno I can totally see them saying "muh norms and traditions are more important than any single bill".
They did it in 2016 when they wanted to confirm a justice by exempting that issue specifically. Maybe they'll invent a loophole for themselves
Republicans don't give a single shit about "norms", which tbf is their only respectable quality. This wouldn't be unprecedented either, since in the past they eliminated filibustering for passing the government budget (which is why the parliamentarian was able to block the minimum wage increase, because the parliamentarian decides what is and isn't part of the "budget" and the dems tried to pass the minimum wage through the budget).
I was talking about Democrats.
The filibuster is imaginary. It takes 60 votes to surpass unless they decide to just use the other path that only takes 51. If you have a cohesive majority the filibuster isn’t real.
Don't you need more than a simple majority to pass an amendment?
It's not an amendment. We don't have the bill text but it appears that based on the title it will be them implementing a ban based on some interpretation of the 14th constitutional amendment, section 1 of which reads:
this is where bipartisanship comes in
Dems will vote yes and then pat themselves on the back for being “classy losers”.
I'm predicting a party-line vote, with a couple red-state democrats crossing the aisle.
Most likely scenario imo. And of course those red dems will not be expelled from the party because it's important to have a big tent.