225
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by RedWizard@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 81 points 11 months ago

thanks biden biden-forgor

Good luck my fellow American comrades

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 11 months ago

What does Biden have to do with this? Even if he did something about Roe vs Wade getting overturned, they would've overturned his action, right?

[-] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 49 points 11 months ago

He could have codified it so it couldn't be overturned, or only overturned by passing seemingly impossible hurdles. Plus this isn't a shock, for four years it's been known that this was on the table should Republicans win again, so any action would have at least been better optics than doing nothing. But it's worth noting that Biden doesn't personally support abortions anyways, so I reckon he's happy about this (if he can understand what's happening)

[-] poppy_apocalypse@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago

obama-medal said he'd codify it on day one, then came to his senses and found a bipartisan solution. Thanks. Obama

[-] Lurker123@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Hmm, out of curiosity, where did you come to this belief that congress can pass laws which are impossible to overturn or require hurdles to jump through to overtur? Did you read an article on it? Is the idea to couple an abortion bill with another bill trying to strip Supreme Court review authority?

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 11 months ago

He could have codified it so it couldn't be overturned, or only overturned by passing seemingly impossible hurdles.

Isn't every law equal? How would that work?

[-] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 40 points 11 months ago

Biden could legally kill Trump.

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago

Could've but he choose not to

[-] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

they would’ve overturned this action, right?

So what? He was at the highest power, he could have easily told repubs to fuck off and make overturning it impossible

[-] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago

and make overturning it impossible

How?

[-] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

While Biden was in office, you could at the very least imagine the reverse of what the topic of discussion is now.

Laws are just norms on paper that are constantly trampled via clever loopholes or spurious court-rulings - they don't actually matter - what matters is who is wielding power and whether anyone is able to stop them. Law-enforcement or invocation of laws is how said power is applied to the stated laws, but stated laws are not a prerequisite to the enforcement of policy/statutes/whims. The lack of a legal pathway to achieve something simply articulates the class character of a polity, not the inability to obtain any certain goal. If something is made nigh impossible to do legally then that is just political deterrence and state-sanctioned football-lucy

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Drone footage of every single anti-abortion senator while they're taking a shit in the toilet for one.

[-] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago

yeah it's honestly more obama's fault for having a supermajority and not using it to enshrine any type of rights

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
225 points (99.6% liked)

news

24519 readers
480 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS