28
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

The democrats know all these things and don’t care. they’re just as much in service to the billionaires as the republicans.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They'd rather lose to Republicans than cross their "donors."

The gravy train runs to both parties as long as they protect this sociopathic grift of an economy from the people it enslaves. The DNC would consider winning on a platform of ending oligarchy (which could only ever happen with a left wing populist that steals the party out from under them like Trump did to the GOP, solely to steal their grift machine in his case) a catastrophic defeat and national crisis on the level we wish they'd treat Trump like.

It's why leaders like Nancy Pelosi make it their mission to sabotage spoiler members (because both parties promote on the basis of being a good bribe getter and taker) like AOC. She spent weeks before Trump was inaugurated making calls to prevent AOC's committee leadership bid. There's the DNC's priorities.

Our whole captured government is a game of neoliberal/fascist-good cop/bad cop. Do you want to waste your life enriching sociopath would be pharoahs with affirmation ribbons or scapegoats? A con game we can't stop playing as we're exploited dry.

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Liberals don't care. Socialists / progressives do care. Bernie and AOC have consistently fought to expand class consciousness and to fight against the growing wealth disparity

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The "liberals" you speak of are just conservatives larping as liberals

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

The word for a liberal that cares about class consciousness is "Error: undefined. Did you mean socialist?"

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago

I’ll give Bernie a pass although he’s a milquetoast ineffectual social democrat. AOC is a fraud.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know, I see people like you saying this stuff and I guess I don’t understand it. WHO are you advocating for to do the thing(s) you want? I would like specific names you would put forward.

I’m not politically educated enough to know who these others are that someone like you would recommend, but I do see a lot of complaining and not enough solutions being presented so that someone like me could learn about them.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

People can complain without giving a solution. Just because they don't know what the way to solve it is, doesn't mean they have no right to air their grievances

Unless of course, you also want to control their free speech and dissent from the party is seen as abhorrent for you

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I never said I want to control their free speech. I said I wanted to know what their solution was because they are complaining about the solutions that are currently in play.

Someone can absolutely be angry and if there is no solution known and you just need to rant, then just…say that? At least I understand that line of thinking of knowing there is a problem without knowing the answer, but at least admit that.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago

Anarchism. I have zero faith in government and my beliefs have only gotten stronger and stronger as I’ve gotten older.

There’s no one in government I trust. AOC is neolib larping as a progressive/ social democrat. They’re all still liberals and don’t actually threaten capital.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thank you.

I don’t personally think anarchism is the right thing based on the definition of anarchy but I get your line of thinking. A legit real, physical resistance is probably needed.

I have zero faith in our American government as well. They want to status quo and don’t want to give up their power.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

There are many different kinds of anarchy, I can assure you the common definition of “chaos” is inaccurate.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

And anarchy is achieved by complaining about all government options online?

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

And what is achieved by voting for democrats? Fascism?

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a small action to help less get fascism. It's arguably more effective than manifesting anarchism

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Well you failed, you got just as much fascism because liberals create the conditions that enable fascism and do nothing to stop it because that would offend their capitalist donors. Read a history book instead of smugly scolding the left for your failures.

[-] lurklurk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Good luck with your strategy of ... checks notes... doing nothing

It's honestly amusing

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Good luck with your strategy of voting harder seems to be working out great for ya shit lib.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The democrats know all these things and don’t care.

Kevin Phillips, the Republican architect of the "Southern Strategy, has a vastly different view. He essentially said, in his book, "American Dynasty", that Republicans think of the working class as dirt to be used however they royally please, while Democrats at least acknowledged that the working class enabled them to be where they are and supported them.
BYTW, Kevin Phillips, who is very politically knowledgeable, is now extremely disillusioned with Republicans and generally hates both parties.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe that was true in 2004 when it was published but it is no longer true. Both see the working class as dirt.

[-] KnowledgeableNip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Controlled opposition.

But still better than whatever is happening now. I can't imagine a Nazi salute at Kamala's inauguration.

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

True, liberals are the lesser evil compared to neocons and fascists.

But the top 100 richest billionaires grew their wealth by 63% under Biden so liberalism still inevitably leads to extreme wealth disparities that erode democracy until neo-feudalistic oligarchy is all that will remain

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

I generally avoid painting them all with a single brush like that.

Some absolutely are bought off like you describe. But an awful lot are not — the big problem we've had is that the contingent of the bought off Democrats plus the Republicans has been enough to block meaningful action, even when the Democrats have had a nominal majority.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

I’m tired of the excuse making for them. It’s like sitting at a table of 10 Nazis. Guess what? It’s 11 Nazis.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The last 3 elections have shown there are only two groups: Republicans and Republicans that get paid less.

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

I feel like they get paid just as much only put on a fucking costume and pretend to be something they aren’t.

But thank you for your sane comment in a world of complete fucking insanity and denial about what’s really going on.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

Fortunately there's other parties

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

As it stands, third-party will never win in the US.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

Fortunately we can change the election system to be democratic. Maine did it years ago, for example

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Good luck with that on a federal level. Neither the Democrats nor Republicans will risk losing an inch of power.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Luigi has entered the chat

[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

That I voted for despite the fact they’ll never get an ounce of power

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21931 readers
1651 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS