How native Hawaiians feel about the occupation regime (twitter.com)

submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Perhaps it was you that didn’t pay attention to the title in the first place?

see, I have proof, you have madboi rage you can’t process like a healthy person, so you direct it outwards at the person who pointed out - with evidence - that you’re wrong. classy.

now that two different people explained to you that “people who live there” clearly meant “natives”

you mean “moved the goalposts when they could win an argument and on facts”. lying now when there’s plenty f evidence here proving that you’re lying is a pretty bad way to try to convince someone of something.

Perhaps now that you’ve been explained what “occupation” means

I don’t need a bunch of angry trolls who can’ open their mouths without lies, rage, childish insults, and logical fallacies falling out to “explain” anything to me.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t need a bunch of angry trolls who can’ open their mouths without lies, rage, childish insults, and logical fallacies falling out to “explain” anything to me.

I'm pretty sure you understand what we're talking about here: what Native Hawaiians think about being part of the US. Your argument was that once native Hawaiians became minority there was a vote and the majority of immigrant, non-native inhabitants voted to legalize it's status so it's OK. I pointed out, that since we're taking about Native Hawaiians it doesn't really matter how non-natives voted on it. Instead of addressing this you just started using the old argument of "look only on the literal meaning of this comment and ignore the whole point of this discussion". And now here we are. You're angry and rejecting all arguments because being right about one phrase is more important to you than actually talking about this issue. Ok, so you win. You win the pointless discussion about one comment. Are you happy now? Can we now go back to the original point and talk about native Hawaiians? Or you're not actually interested in the topic and are here only to do some light trolling?

[-] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m pretty sure you understand what we’re talking about here:

I’m pretty sure I see through your logical fallacies and am not buying your mental gymnastics to cover for them.

this isn’t about “winning” just because that’s how you see the world, although I would categorically say that you’ve lost. lost time, lost face, and certainly lost your mind if you think you’ve won anything here.

Or you’re not actually interested in the topic and are here only to do some light trolling?

says the troll, lmao

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, you're really smart and you're crashing this online argument. You're logic is impeccable and you're arguments are flawless. I give up, you win!

Changing the subject now, completely unrelated question: do you know how native Hawaiians feel about being part of the US?

[-] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, you’re really smart and you’re crashing this online argument. Your logic is impeccable and your arguments are flawless. I give up, you win!

it’s sad this is the only way you can see the world. it explains your trolling.

Changing the subject now

why would I engage in a discussion with a troll, knowing full well you have no problem lying, twisting my words, and using very logical fallacy in the book?