16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"OMG guys look. Nazis were a specific group in Germany circa the 1940's. Elon is just a massive, authoritarian loving racist, okay? Not a Nazi. Read a dictionary."

God I wish I just came up with that joke myself instead of basing it on real arguments I've heard. 😮‍💨

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If he's not from the Nazi region of Germany, he's not real Nazi, he's just a sparkling fascist. 🧐

(Not an original comment, but it's too good not to recycle)

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

I’ve gotten really wary of people when they start splitting hairs:

  • “Nazis were a specific group in Germany”
  • “What’s happening is Gaza isn’t a real genocide”
  • “Hebephilia is not the same as pedophilia”
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago
  • "cartoon animal sex isn't the same as beastiality"
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean.....yeah, ok. You're not wrong in adding that one to the pile, but also it's really weird that was your instinctive go-to on this subject.

We're over here talking about genocide, and hate, and war, and death. You're over here like "Hey, don't forget how some people find looney toons sexy!"

[-] ddplf@szmer.info 0 points 1 month ago

Ouch, some folks ain't gonna like this comment

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh I know. Im not sorry. They know why wanking to animal sex isn't right.

[-] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Drawings can't hurt you, dawg.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean I'm not into it, but I would also not call sex between anthropomorphic cartoon characters that take on the qualities of animals the same as animal sex. It's basically mythical creature sex. I mean would it be animal sex if someone was into, for example, centaur sex? Because we're essentially talking about creatures that look somewhat like the animals they are supposed to be, but more more like humans.

I have yet to see a rabbit or a mouse that look especially close to Bugs or Mickey.

Again, not my thing, but I wouldn't classify it in the same category as bestiality and I would guess that a lot of people into that would not be into actual animal sex at all.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Im pretty sure you're not into it. But it's the same thing as little girl cartoon sex. It ain't right.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.

Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?

People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don't approve of their specific kink.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

Yes I'd say centaur sex is beastiality. It's not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.

I'm not going to give anyone a pass because it's "anthropomorphic". That's a cop out.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Again- people actually into bestiality are promoting animal cruelty. These people are not. I have no idea why you can't see the difference.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It can not promote animal cruelty and still be disgusting. It doesn't need to be I/0.

But anyways, I don't want to spend my morning talking anymore about this subject.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Whether or not you personally find it disgusting and whether or not it is the same as bestiality are two very different things.

This is uncomfortably close to "men who sexually assault little boys" is a subset of homosexuality. It is not.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

I disagree. If someone wanks to drawings of little boys, they are a pedophile.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yet again, show me a mouse that looks or even acts like Mickey. You keep avoiding the fact that what they are into are not animals, they're mythical creatures.

Until you can show some evidence that what they are actually into is real animals that actually exist then you are just doing the "pedophiles are gay" thing.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles. Whether the mouse looks like Mickey doesn't matter. If it's being sexual then it's beastiality.

Anywhoo Im done with this conversation. I will noy be responding back again.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles.

Yes, that is my point.

Similarly, by this "furries are bestialists" logic, BDSM and sexual assault are the same thing. I hope you don't believe that.

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk -1 points 1 month ago

It isn't, but they're still wrong'uns if you ask me.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Enjoying watching animals having sex is beastiality. It is wrong, I agree.

"It's not beastiality".
"Well that doesn't mean it's beastiality"
Lol

[-] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Isn't that why we have the term neonazi? Nothing watered-down about that!

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

Comic Strips

13257 readers
307 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS