The federation drama really drives home the fact that liberals despise anyone and everyone with better politics than themselves. They want a monopoly on "being good" and being shown up enrages them. (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Every liberal does it too, from center right radlibs to far-right "conservatives": the most extreme right fringe liberals hate the mainstream liberals for not being bigoted enough, the mainstream libs hate the radlibs for not being cruel enough, and the radlibs hate the left for not being chauvinist enough.

Denouncing chauvinism in particular is like a liberal moral event horizon, a cardinal sin against their self-interested belief in the righteousness of the imperial hegemon that keeps the treats flowing at gunpoint.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Not really, if anything it's simply pointing out a pathology of politics, ideological liberals simply call it "purity" and do in fact despise left-wing shifts that don't gel with their conception of optics and civility, nonsensical terms like "overton window" becoming popular are another example of this kind of mindset

That's how the cognitive dissonance actually manifests itself when certain liberals encounter positions to their left

[-] Florist@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ideological liberals despise left-wing shifts because it doesn't gel with their understanding of economics and their broader political values, not because they think leftists have a better politics.

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ideological liberals sure, but they're a minority usually only found in academia and think tanks, if it held for most liberals they wouldn't need to come up with terms like "purity politics" or the "I'm a socialist not communist" discourse you see in progressive liberal circles, Bernie Sander never would have called himself a socialist and become popular if what you're saying was true for the majority

Left-Liberals wouldn't need to come up with clichés like "don't let PERFECT be the enemy of good", that implies these people believe there is a "perfect" and that the leftists they're arguing with hold to it, that's not a fundamental split, at least with social liberals

Frankly the majority of liberals are too uneducated to have fundamental ideological disagreements with us, they don't even understand their own ideology, they have emotional and social disagreements with us grounded in personnel material pressures, but outside the top 20% it's shallow and can be easily broken depending on where they fall in the tax bracket