30
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

EDIT: I’m agreeing with you here. My tone was probably confusingly aggressive. I just meant to add the idea that managers wouldn’t even know if WFH was good or bad let alone know whether you should keep your full pay.

How about we decide on what doing the job actually is, in a way that can reasonably be measured, and then see if we can do it better from home or the office?!

I’ve always felt that the elephant in the room on this is that remote work highlights the incompetence of management. And so instead of embracing the notion that remote work can work well provided the work force is well orchestrated, they’ve embraced fear mongering around uncontrolled labour.

I have to come into the office four days a week. I commute 90 minutes each way to sit at my desk and have meetings over Teams with my project team who are scattered all over the world.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yyyep! That’s what this mind rot gets you!

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
30 points (85.7% liked)

Antiwork

8514 readers
69 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS