740
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ruk_n_rul 13 points 13 hours ago

Actually overenginnering is the thing with pre-modern structures, like the bottom bridge here. Survivorship bias played a role, where things they don't build to last, evidently don't last to this day, but mostly it's because they don't really understand the math behind all of it so they take the most conservative and the tried and tested rules of thumb when doing big structures. This is why big projects back then can take decades to complete.

In the modern day, we design specifically to balance durability and cost, and we are confident of our maths and understanding of material science to use the least amount that does the work for the design life that we choose.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

This is why big projects back then can take decades to complete.

Good thing that's not a problem anymore.

[-] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

From my pov I think you're repeating exactly what I said, but I appreciate the additional details.

My last point is that "the design life we choose" is usually dictated by non-engineering forces. A 12th century king can throw resources at a problem. A 20th century governor cannot, and doesn't care to. They care about the bridge lasting until the end of their term limits.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
740 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

20033 readers
1304 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS