11
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Let's be honest: Everything that might be "worse" or "annoying" in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to "no working adblocker available". A browser without adblock is unusable

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I've tested and used in the past... Holy shit, 30+ years!!

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

30+ years!

.....fuck off, '94 wasn't 30.... counts on fingers several times

.....Shit.....

[-] Teal@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn’t sound right but it is. I think in ‘94 I was using Juno for email and internet. Shortly after that it was time to actually use one of the many AOL trial discs for service instead of a mini frisbee/ninja star.

Modem sounds, chat rooms, you’ve got mail. What a time to live!

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck. I got free internet for almost 5 years. So many AOL discs. 01, 02? Friend's dad had a T1 connection put into their house for his work. The difference between T1 and the 56k I had at home? At home walk out the room, have a smoke, maybe ⅔ a boob loaded. At buddy's house, that's when I realised that the internet had the potential to change everything. Whole boob before you could even stand up.

Kids these days. No appreciation for how much struggle it used to be. Everything just. Just there. No bork the only computer in the house because boob.exe.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I know... Jurassic Park is 33 years this year. It would be like watching a movie from the 60' when it was released.

We're old, friend.

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

I've never hated my life more than right now...

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 weeks ago

In the past 10 years it's pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera's engine died in 2013.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

99% if browsers are just skinned Chrome.

Yup. Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox, only because it's not built on Chromium.

[-] AJ1@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox

Just FYI, the word "hence" literally means "for this reason". So you just said "for this reason the reason" lol.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Chill dude, I’m just going to the ATM machine to put in my PIN number to take out some money. 🤙

[-] kat@orbi.camp -1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 weeks ago

Chrome uses WebKit, safaris engine.

[-] Bourff@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Chrome forked Webkit in 2012 to create Blink. It is reasonable to assume they have somewhat diverged since.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're developed separately. It's a hard fork so I consider them different.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Man I haven’t been around that long but I feel like some of my knowledge is outdated and I have to start with “a long time ago in a galaxy far far away” because I stopped paying attention

[-] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn't that all most people need from a browser

[-] krimson@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I have no idea either. Sure, chrome is a little faster but its a minor difference in my opinion. Been using it for a long time and have no idea why it's so unpopular.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Also, keep in mind, google has been caught slowing Firefox down in YouTube before. So if you notice any slowness in their services, it's fair to suspect it might not be Firefox's fault.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I very much dislike Mozilla's direction over the last decade. They're introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I'm also trying to get away from Mozilla.

[0] On Firefox Mobile, there's a "feature" which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn't actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn't autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

Mozilla doesn't care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly "good" browser manufacturer.

[-] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

Do you have a good non chromium based alternative? To be clear I genuinely am asking those things make switching probably worth it considering how little of a hassle it is.

[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago
[-] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

This comment made me look into if KDE has one and apparently they do it even has built in ad blocking.

Off to compile for 3 hours. /j

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

Makes me remember when I used Konqueror with FF as a fallback before Chrome existed.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

Mainly that Google intentionally makes its sites (like YouTube or Google Docs) slower and less useable when they detect you're using Firefox, and/or ad blockers (which you need Firefox to use, so same difference).

It's mostly fixable with add-ons and userscripts (and eventually, one hopes, with an antitrust lawsuit), but it's still a hassle.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, with the FTC rolling back net neutrality protections, I don’t see an antitrust lawsuit happening, or succeeding, anytime soon

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

how do I find out more about this and what scripts do I need to make the sites faster again on Firefox

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/youtube-responds-to-delayed-loading-in-rival-browser-complaints, for instance.

Or https://www.zdnet.com/article/former-mozilla-exec-google-has-sabotaged-firefox-for-years/, for an older one.

As for how to fix it, Mozilla tend to do a pretty good job of eventually working around Google's bullshit, so keeping the browser updated is a good first step.

Since Google tends to roll this stuff out regionally and doing A/B testing, though, the best way is to identify what specific handicap they're hassling you with (which specific features don't work or don't work right, when they work properly on chrome), and look for an updated add on or userscript to fix that particular issue.

Or you can just look for a generic YouTube or Google Docs "enhancer" add on and hope it fixes the issue without making the whole user experience too different from what you're used to.

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

Would you happen to know whether this is something that a UserAgent spoofer would suffice to get around?

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

At one particular point it was, if I recall correctly, though Chrome also (mis)implements some standards its own way, so Google might also use that as a form of attack against anyone who implements them properly, much like Microsoft did in the bad old IE6 days...

It's all a silly arms race, though, with Google coming up with new ways to enshittify the web for anyone not using Chrome or using ad blockers and Mozilla and ad blocker (and alternative YouTube frontend) developers trying to figure out what they broke this time and how to fix it, so what worked yesterday might not work today and work again tomorrow.

It's all a profoundly stupid waste of everyone's time and resources (all for a few more ad views) which will hopefully end up with Google losing their monopoly position on the web like the Internet Explorer bullshit did for Microsoft, but will keep being a major hassle for everyone until it does.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 0 points 3 weeks ago

Too many people complain about the UI and claim it's "outdated, ugly, unusable". I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome's UI.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, you USED to be able to, anyways, but they've slowly moved to a less customisable ui. Now you have to use extensions from outside websites to even do simple stuff like have a multi-row tab bar.

Not to mention Firefox seems to break them every year or so.

[-] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm one of those complaining about the UI. Used the TabMixPlus extension to adjust the UI to my liking. FF killed it. So, I started customizing the UI CSS. Every few versions, Mozilla changed the browser enough to invalidate my changes. After a while, I got tired of thiz and switched to Vivaldi, which is Chromium based.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66609 readers
2322 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS