2042
fuck this
(mander.xyz)
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
That is literally how the mathematics of elections work, whether you wish to believe in reality or not.
they are rigged irl
it's a story, not math.
Simplified: 3 > (1+1) but 3 < (1+1+1+1)
Questions?
when will you accept that there are an infinite number of possible outcomes, including no one taking power at all?
It is vitally important, not just in elections but also in life overall, to recognize that not all possibilities are equally likely and to use available data to evaluate them.
For example, it is possible that a white rhinoceros might come down the hall and join me for a spot of tea and biscuits. I can, however, safely say that that is almost definitely not going to happen, based upon these data points:
Yes, this is a exaggerated caricature. However, data with even more clarity is available surrounding election outcomes. Betting on a possible outcome without any evidence to suggest that it is likely is foolish and betting on an outcome that one knows is unlikely, while increasing the likelihood of an outcome known to be harmful to vulnerable people is detestable.
no one is talking about betting but you. the discussion is about ethics and voting.