What is still considered a rivalry, even though it's mostly one-sided? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 6 days ago by venotic@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't have any good examples that I know of, but I am very curious. To me though, a rivalry is a rivalry when two or more of people are closely competitive. But is it really a rivalry anymore when someone has more victories over the other? I don't think so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

If we're talking football ⚽, a rivalry is usually a long term thing, that transcends temporary factors like winning records.

You only have to look at Liverpool and Everton, or Man City and Man United, or Aston Villa and Birmingham City, to see that rivalry can be fierce and lasting even when one side enjoys a long period of dominance over the other.

As long as it matters more than most games to both sets of fans, it's a rivalry IMO.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025

29 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

46262 readers

1546 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS