33
‘A lot worse than expected’: AI Pac-Man clones, reviewed
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)
Games
18359 readers
943 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm actually scoffing it's not even capable of doing that very well.
It's a pretty simple question though, it just requires sanitized training data. Don't include Pacman code, and then ask it for that.
Oh sure, let's just retrain a zillion-parameter model on 99.999% of its original corpus. I'm sure that's easier than making up a game.
Does any one of these AI outputs look like a specific GitHub project? Because we already have the technology to just copy-paste a whole thing. It's called git. This is doing something different.