43
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Their ToS only allow one account per person...

Does anyone here have more than 1 free account on such platforms?

Has there been cases where people got banned for having more than 1 free account?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 29 points 6 days ago

Probably nothing would happen to you. They might correlate your IP address and ban you, but that's likely it.

However, don't do that. Servers aren't free, and if people abuse the charity of these services, they'll stop offering free options for everyone.

If you need extra addresses, use something like https://addy.io/. if you need more storage, might be worth considering self-hosting your email.

[-] Pirata@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Probably nothing would happen to you. They might correlate your IP address and ban you, but that's likely it.

I mean, that's probably the worst thing that can happen to your email, lol. Consider how much your online life depends on access to your email.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

True, but I would suppose that depends how intertwined your account is with your life. A couple of new accounts probably wouldn't matter that much. I just more meant that they wouldn't try to sue you, or something.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 6 days ago

Due to CGNAT it's likely to have up to hundreds or thousands of unrelated customers sharing an IPv4 address

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Perhaps, but if I connect from my IP and then 30sec later to a different account on the same IP, and that happens routinely for the same accounts, one could reasonably assume it was potentially one person using two accounts.

You could circumvent that with a VPN, since those IP ranges are usually known and known to be shared, but probably not with a residential IP address.

Anyway, it's just a guess. I don't know with any certainty how they might sus out somebody breaking the policy. I just believe that if they find people doing that with regularity, the free tier many people enjoy can be revoked, and so it would be a dick move to try to abuse account creation.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Sure, but on my WiFi network with my flat mates there would be like five concurrently logged in email accounts constantly connected and receiving traffic from proton. And then behind CGNAT that might extend to a hundred people concurrently logged in with one IP.

The false positives would drive away so many more paying or future paying customers it wouldn't be worth trying

Only thing I can think of is fingerprinting devices but then that'd be obvious, break their business model and also drive away customers

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 3 points 6 days ago

Addy is nice but sometimes blocked, and a bit expensive.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Free for me. I haven't paid them a cent. Depends what you need out of the service.

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago

For sure, but the lack of feature to reply/send is certainly limiting after a certain point

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm able to reply just fine. They have a special address that goes to your inbox, and when you reply, it looks like you're replying from that alias and not your main email address.

That was one of the first things I checked on, since replying is sometimes necessary.

You can also send by going into your Aliases and clicking "Send" by one of your aliases. This will open a dialogue that creates the recipient address you need to use in whatever email address is verified with Addy.

ETA: and to be abundantly clear, I'm using the free tier. This is all included in the free option.

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Free plan states

Anonymous Reply + Send From Daily Limit "X"

as unsupported for the free plan... So I'm quite surprised

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 6 days ago

Sure but they probably make more than enough money. Email is really cheap to run

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Perhaps, but you're just guessing. I don't know their operating costs, and I would suspect that neither do you.

If you know better, please enlighten me.

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago

Again, just relatively common sense.

Postfix etc... isn't that hard to run. I selfhost a mailcow installation, which is considered "full" and "expensive to run" and it's still really fine to run. Not expensive when scaling up to multiple users, the most important is the initial performance cost per instance.

We're mostly paying for salaries and R&D I believe. They're developing other services and stuff, but they could easily charge less and still be profitable, they just wouldn't have this much reserves.

Perhaps they don't realise that by lowering their subscription costs, they could get more users... like me

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Sounds like a market opportunity.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
43 points (92.2% liked)

Privacy

36417 readers
722 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS