249
submitted 2 months ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] db2@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago

It isn't yours, if you use them you signed it all over to them. They patented your DNA.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago

I’m hoping in 500 years, my DNA sequence is found on a perfectly preserved micro SD card and my clone gets to meet President Camacho and take on Beef Supreme and the Dildozer on Monday Night Rehabilitation.

[-] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

That's the optimistic timeline, we still have to actually get there first.

I am sure you can come with what a pessimistic timeline would look like.

[-] felbane@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I don't have to, I watched Planet of the Apes

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

They patented your DNA.

You can't patent DNA... They can sell it though, with a simple TOS update (if they even need to).

[-] db2@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For those too lazy to click through:

However, on June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc, that human genes cannot be patented because DNA is a “product of nature.” All gene patents were invalidated with this ruling. However, the ruling did not prohibit the patenting of DNA that is manipulated (i.e., no longer a product of nature) or processes for identifying DNA sequences.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So if a lab rat adds, deletes or edits a person's DNA it is no longer a 'product of nature'?

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

[...] human genes cannot be patented because DNA is a “product of nature.” All gene patents were invalidated with this ruling.

did you paste the link to admit you were wrong?

[-] db2@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Did you stop reading before you should have?

[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

The monsters.

Well, that originally autocorrected to "mobsters," but I suppose that'd work in a certain context, too.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That’s not true in the slightest. I agree with the fuck 23&me sentiment but you don’t have to make things up to criticize them.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
249 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

71272 readers
3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS