102
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Gem@lemmynsfw.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago

What is the point of buying a gaming console instead of a PC if not for the exclusives? Also what about all those games funded by exclusive contracts that would not have existed?

[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I buy consoles because i don't want to setup, configure, fix, ant upgrade computers.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You for some reason assume that games would not have existed if not for being exclusive. But you do not actually know that. Yes, exclusive games do exist. But also quite obviously non-exclusive games exist. It is obviously possible to get games funded without being exclusive.

It is impossible to predict the future, or similarly, predict alternative versions of the past. I do not claim to know for sure that the same amount of games would exist without exclusivity. But since non-exclusive games are possible, and actually in the majority, it seems very likely to me that when a consumer demand is there, supply for it would be created.

In the end, this is an argument about cooperation vs competition. The argument for exclusives is basically an argument for competition. The argument against exclusives is one for cooperation. My base thinking is, why create many different consoles, that all just contain a CPU, some graphical processing unit, some way to load games on it, when you can just save the work of everyone developing their own thing and duplicating work, when everyone could just work together to create the same thing, just with more minds working together and without duplicating work.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Not all games? I mean the exclusive games like Bayonetta 3.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Yes but can you really know that Bayonetta would not have been made without exclusives? Maybe if exclusives didn't exist Bayonetta would've just secured funding some other way. You can't know that now anymore, because that's not what happened, but it's not entirely unreasonable to believe that Bayonetta could have turned to other funding sources, if the situation was different at the time.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

I mean ya. Bayonetta doesn't sell well but as an exclusive it brings variety to the system. I think the creators themselves said something like 2 and 3 wouldn't exist if it wasn't funded by Nintendo.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
102 points (84.5% liked)

Games

18359 readers
744 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS