301
submitted 4 weeks ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

Religion is a scam built to take advantage and control the uneducated masses.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Many religions are. The ones that focus inward to better yourself are not bothering anyone. When was the last time a Buddhist knocked on your door and asked you to find Buddha?

Edit: The self-righteousness of some atheists is truly hypocritical. Persecution is wrong, whether it’s of an atheist by a religious person, or vice versa. Yet another reason to be disappointed in my fellow man, I guess.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

There's a difference between faith and organized religion. I have nothing against the former, but the latter brings only trouble

[-] SnowChickenFlake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, similar thoughts here

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Buddhism is one of the world’s largest religions and originated 2,500 years ago in India.

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/buddhism/

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Stupid thing to downvote, it’s so short if any of you 11 downvoters are here you can probably get a quick dunk in without typing more than 100 characters

“Appeal to age = irrelevant” would be one example (I made this up, not stating it for debate)

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

That entire link is irrelevant, so downvote is applicable. No point engaging in an argument that is fallacious to begin with.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Ah was intrigued by the thought but not the link :)

Thanks for improvin’ my Lemmy - nice thing to do after minirant

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, I used to think that about Sikhism as well. Then I did some research. Every religion can and has been abused.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

Of course it can, just as science has the ability to do the same. Do we brand all scientists as unethical because of Unit 731 or the Nuremberg trials? Ironically, this entire thread is very unscientific in its criticism of the religious.

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Right, except religion serves no purpose that a non-religious group can't do. Do you see why equating religion and science is pretty silly?

The only purpose of religion is to spread. Everything else is just a means to an end. Just take every good aspect of religion and remove the faith and the god from it. It becomes better. Teach people to do stuff because it is right, not because X god says so.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Buddhism is a religion in the same way that Christianity is a religion. I.e. it's an abstract concept and not an implementation.

The implementations are invariably the problem. Just look at Myanmar.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 0 points 4 weeks ago

Fact: we would be better off if all of humanity were atheists

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

That is an opinion by definition. Facts can be proven true or false. “Better off” is a subjective sentiment. How very unscientific of you.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Not sure about this one, but we'd definitely be better off if religion was treated as strictly something you practice personally at home and not as part of any large hierarchy.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

They fall into the same category of people that look inward and find themselves as a train or an anime character or some other spirit animal / past life bullshit.

These are all people that need mental help and prescription medication.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

That’s where atheists overstep. Why does it matter what someone believes if it has no effect on you? Isn’t that exactly what you criticize the religious of doing?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Other people's beliefs directly impact me constantly through laws justified by religious doctrine, social pressures, imposing themselves into government offices, and being used to promote lying politicians who claim to be members but never following the teachings while gaining votes for being on the same team.

It has negatively affected me my entire life, even if it isn't a obvious as racism and misogyny.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

So you’re saying that you want separation from religion. Why can’t they have that from you? I agree that religion doesn’t belong in government. What about that justifies extermination of religion?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I didn't say anything about extrrninating religion, I responded to your comment saying people's beliefs have no affect on an atheist.

Atheists being against religion is a reaction to the default assumption that everyone is part of a religion. The label atheist only exists as a response to beliefs.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Right, until they harm someone or themselves by thinking they can fly if they believe hard enough or that they can get into a magical afterlife if they kill enough people. If you are open to that magic thinking then you are open to be manipulated and used.

Or their beliefs turn extremists because religion like cancer or capitalism needs unending growth to fuel its existence. People need to be kept uneducated and gullible enough to buy into the fantasy and to donate more money to make the clergy that will inevitably rape some kids.

These same people are bringing their fantasy into politics and look where that brought America and or the religious war going on.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Way to project. Find me articles on Buddhists harming people because they think they can fly. While I’m waiting, would you like me to provide scientific research that resulted in harm?

You can’t have it both ways. If you want boundaries that protect you from the religious, then you yourself must respect the same boundary.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Like every large religion, a significant portion of the followers will ignore any teaching in the right contexts. Christians are about turning the other cheek and loving thy neighbor except for the crusades and witch trials, Islam is the religion of peace except for when it isn't, and Buddhism has its own exceptions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence

As found in other religious traditions, Buddhism has an extensive history of violence dating back to its inception.

These remarks followed the 1973 student-led uprising, as well as the creation of a Thai parliament and the spread of communism in neighboring East Asian countries. The fear of communism shaking the social forms of Thailand felt a very real threat to Kittivuddho, who expressed his nationalist tendencies in his defense of militant actions. He justified his argument by dehumanizing the Communists and leftists that he opposed. In the interview with Caturat he affirmed that this would not be the killing of people, but rather the killing of monsters/devils. He similarly asserted that while killing of people is prohibited and thus de-meritorious in Buddhist teachings, doing so for the "greater good" will garner greater merit than the act of killing will cost.

[-] zloubida@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

You know everything, apparently.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Except that many highly educated people are also into religions :(

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Childhood indoctrination works wonders to keep you scam going.

[-] nyamlae@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Plenty of educated religious people are converts. I was raised atheist and converted to Buddhism in my late teens. The same was true of many of the other students in my university's religious studies department.

The fact is, being religious doesn't depend on lack of education or childhood indoctrination. People will still be religious in the absence of those things.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

The whole life has a purpose and eternal soul thing make people want to believe as well

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think that more than a few highly successful people who are both religious and not stupid, have realized what religion actually is and manipulate it to their advantage.

Not all, but I suspect there's more than a few.

[-] gens@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago

Religion is to calm a heart when it has nowhere to turn to.

Problem is the same as with comunism, few in power get greedy.

[-] nyamlae@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

Religion is "built" by the actions of countless religious people. There is not a single cohesive force shaping its development. Religion has also been used for education, political liberation, charity, and emotional healing. Reality is complex.

[-] nyamlae@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

As an aside, people who are bothered by my arguments should consider watching Contrapoints' recent video on conspiracism. The points I am making in this thread are the same points she makes against conspiracy theories.

Atheists like the OP suggest (ironically) that religion is an intentionalist, evil force, but a basic survey of the history of religion easily disproves this type of thinking. Intentionalism and binarism are cankers on the pursuit of truth. Like politics, religion is nuanced; it is not a grand conspiracy, even if there are groups in it who conspire. Atheists would do well to be wary of conspiracism, lest they place their hatred of religion over their pursuit of truth.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
301 points (93.1% liked)

memes

14419 readers
1703 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS