1285
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] exasperation@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Yup. If, for example, you're designing a deep space mission, where every gram counts, there's a conversation to be had about whether it's cost effective (and appropriate risk) to send nuclear reactors and fuel aboard those spacecraft.

Or using modern engineering, whether an aircraft carrier should be powered by nuclear fission or internal combustion of hydrocarbons.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago

Usually space craft have relatively light power needs so why bother with a whole-ass nuclear reactor when an RTG is smaller, lighter, and has no moving parts? They're a pretty common choice for space probes, for example.

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/plutonium.png

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

We're actually running into shortages of Plutonium 238. Which is seriously compromising deep space missions.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
1285 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19432 readers
1282 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS