454
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Sen. Ted Cruz has begged President Donald Trump to stop listening to the tariff hawks in his administration and “take the deal” countries are offering to lower trade barriers.

https://archive.ph/RBX67

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 222 points 11 months ago

Isn't this dude a Senator? He can help end the stupid tariff war any time he wants. If he can grow a spine and bring 4 friends with him he can at least put pressure on his pals on the house of representatives.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 173 points 11 months ago

Ted Cruz famously has no friends.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 11 months ago

Infamously, he's the Zodiac killer

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

His dad killed JFK. It's a whole family thing for the man who refuses to call people by the name they've chosen.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

“If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you.”

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago
[-] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 11 months ago

Ted Cruz has all of the calcified appendages which are correct for a normal human Senator.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago

Isn’t this dude a Senator?

“If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you"

~ Lindsey Graham

Might also be worth noting that his wife is a managing director at Goldman Sachs. I have to imagine she's spent the last week in meltdown mode.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 27 points 11 months ago

“I probably like Ted Cruz more than most of my colleagues like Ted Cruz, and I hate Ted Cruz."

-Al Franken

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/al-franken-ted-cruz/index.html

[-] Sibshops@lemm.ee 48 points 11 months ago

Yeah 2/3 of congress can end the whole trade war. This is just showmanship.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 11 months ago

You don't even need that much. At least at this stage, Trump is abusing existing laws as a sledgehammer against the economy. While Trump can veto new laws passed by "just" 50% of the Congress, they would at least have some leverage to pressure him.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

But he won’t. Because he’s a morally defunct crumpet.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

How dare you impune crumpets by comparison.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

Oh, fuck, we have invoked the wrath of Lemmy's infamous crumpet stans.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

You crumped around. Now it's time to find out.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

In my defense, I really love watching these dumbasses trying to figure out what the heck a crumpet is, and then getting angry because they don't know and just assume it's something awful.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I can pretend, if that helps move things along:

"IT'S THE EXACT SAME THING AS AN ENGLISH MUFFIN!"

The trap is baited. Now, we wait.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Oh so like a regular Muffin with currant and baked beans?

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, that is exactly and unequivocally correct.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Bruh...

If we're waiting for Raphael Cruz to grow a spine we'll never stop waiting.

There's a reason the title includes "begs" and I'm honestly surprised he's doing that.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Does Cuck Cruz even know what a spine is?

[-] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

It is so he can look like he was putting up a fight.

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

The Senate has already passed a bill that limits the President's power to set tariff rates on Canada. The House probably won't take that up.

Right now, there's also a Senate Bill with 7 GOP senators signed on that would limit the President's power to unilaterally set tariffs (requires 48 hours notice to Congress, can't last more than 60 days without Congressional approval, gives Congress fast track procedures for voting down new tariffs). There are some serious constitutional flaws in it (most notably the legislative non-aggrandizement doctrine, but also an issue with tying to sidestep the bicameralism and presentment requirement), though, and I'm not sure it would hit the point where it could overcome a presidential veto.

So right now it's not clear whether this GOP opposition would actually build into real legislation that could actually have an effect, or whether this is all showmanship trying to influence Trump himself to roll this back.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What? And lose the votes of the old guys who drive RVs covered in MAGA signs?

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

At some point he is going to have to pick between them and his main sources of income.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
454 points (98.9% liked)

News

36412 readers
468 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS