77
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by simontherockjohnson@lemmy.ml to c/neurodiverse@hexbear.net

I fucking hate these people so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 63 points 1 day ago

Disgusting article

We have moved from viewing disability through a purely medical lens — as something broken to be fixed — to a social lens that puts the onus on society to accommodate it.

Ah yes, viewing disability as a problem to be fixed is very medical and rational and totally not based entirely on how your society is structured. I am very smart. It's not like someone with disabilities could ever be anything but a burden no matter how much society accommodates them, right? Stephen Hawking? Who's that?

I consider myself squarely left of center.

And yet, I think his remarks echo the reality and pain of a subset of parents of children with autism who feel left out of much of the conversation around the condition. Many advocacy groups focus so much on acceptance, inclusion and celebrating neurodiversity that it can feel as if they are avoiding uncomfortable truths about children like mine.

Once again we see how poisoning political definitions has created a reality where people believe they can call themselves left while believing textbook harmful right-wing ideology.

A Harvard-affiliated research center halted a panel on autism awareness in 2022, after students claimed that the panel’s language about treating autism was “toxic.” A student petition circulated on Change.org said that autism “is not an illness or disease and, most importantly, it is not inherently negative.”

"I, a NYT writer, know more about Autism than the people who fucking research it for a living. I am very smart and believe in science."

I understand why Mr. Kennedy is such a polarizing figure. I did not support his cabinet appointment, and I don’t believe his platform will materially help families like mine. I think his policies are likely to harm. I don’t think he was the right person to make those comments. But I was struck by his willingness to speak frankly about the painful parts of my child’s life. I don’t care if my child ever pays taxes — but I do care that she may never have the opportunity to work or live independently. She did not destroy my family, but I live in constant fear for her safety. I care deeply about her quality of life, and the limited options ahead. I appreciated his acknowledgment, because most of the time, families like mine are invisible.

The "center-leftist" siding with a literal Nazi and not realising the only reason he's acknowledging them is to dehumanise them.

My daughter turns 7 next month. I’ve long accepted that I may never hear her call me mom. I have grieved a million tiny deaths of the things I once assumed would be.

And there we have it, it's not about her child, it's about her. She became a parent because she wanted a "normal child" and now selfishly feels entitled to a "normal child" so she can fit in with societal expectations. The child is a mark of social progression to her, like a car or a home. When you have a child you shouldn't assume they will be anything you expected, they are an independent life that you are devoting yourself to ensuring their best life, not a pet.

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, viewing disability as a problem to be fixed is very medical and rational and totally not based entirely on how your society is structured.

100-com

[-] Salem@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That last paragraph you wrote reminded of that page from Flowers for Algernon, where the father defends his son Charlie from his mother.

Matt - the father - loved his son and accepted him regardless of his disabilities.

We should all be grateful we are not divorced from love, even if just as a concept of it, as Emily May is.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago

We have moved from viewing disability through a purely medical lens — as something broken to be fixed — to a social lens that puts the onus on society to accommodate it.

Neurotypical fascist whining about having to put up with the uppity autistics, example 99472772874.

The worst part is this isn’t some fascist hardliner anomaly view, but the opinion of the average neurotypical. I could count the number of neurotypicals I’ve met who wouldn’t put the neurodiverse “burdens” on flights to El Salvador on one hand. When Trump starts doing just that, I’ll expect nothing short of celebration from the average person, whether or not they openly do so. Sick and diseased society

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's wild that people call call themselves "center left" and then go on to say some eugenics ass shit.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago
[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 41 points 1 day ago

I don’t care if my child ever pays taxes — but I do care that she may never have the opportunity to work or live independently. She did not destroy my family, but I live in constant fear for her safety. I care deeply about her quality of life, and the limited options ahead.

”Does the society we live in have a role in this? No, it's my child who is wrong.”

[-] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago

So many parents view having a "normal" child as their right. "Oh but I spent so long fantasizing about this, how could it not come true?".

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
77 points (98.7% liked)

neurodiverse

1592 readers
58 users here now

What is Neurodivergence?

It's ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc

“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”

So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we're concerned


Rules

1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them

2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence

2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals

3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven't personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you're ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another's, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who's experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm'd.

3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith

4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!

Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input

RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don't be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS