717
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 150 points 3 months ago

KKK stole the outfit from earlier Christian rituals.

[-] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 91 points 3 months ago

White supremacists stole from another culture? Shocking, that's never happened before

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's their culture too, Americans didn't spontaneously generate as a colony. These outfits are from Europe.

The funny thing is that they had periods where they hated Catholics almost as much as their other targets while pretending to be a holy order of Catholic knights. They were literally the exact same kind of Christo-fascist as modern neo-crusaders but wouldn't let Catholics in.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 months ago

For some reason, I'm thinking of the scene in Django Unchained where the guy is griping that his wife worked hard on this!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 36 points 3 months ago

Supremacists always appropriate things. Ok symbol, sacred numbers/symbols, clothing, words, deities, and twist it to exclude.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Yep. There are still swastikas all over Korea because it's been associated with Buddhists for far longer than Hitler who appropriated it. Freaks out visiting westerners, though.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 2 months ago

It's not just Buddhists. Asatru, Norse/Germanic cultures, too. It ticks me off we have to give up things sacred to us because they've been misused. Aleister Crowley reveled in it and played it to the hilt, though. Yeats was not amused.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because fascists have no creativity.

As a general rule at least... I guess you can end up with a Leni Riefenstahl every now and then, but for the most part, if you were a good artist at the time in Germany, you were a target. And I guess one could call Josef Mengele "creative" if you remove all positive connotations from the word.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago

I had to wiki her, and read about Blue Light and her first propaganda film. And her "how could we know." I guess for me it shows how easily anyone, dreamers and realists alike, can fall under the spell of skilled orators, especially the disenfranchised, wounded, left behind. Which is why I think it's important to leave pettiness and insults behind and beneath us, and rise to healing language and honesty, first with ourselves, and then extended to our kindred. Because we are them and they are us. We just mirror our better and worst selves to each other. If what we see as the worst in ourselves repel us and cause us to use unconscionable language and tactics, why would our kindred react differently?

I'm not talking about crimes against things or even necessarily institutions, but about crimes against humanity. The most poignant rl illustration I can refer to is the attempted genocide to the Jewish people, to now the near complete genocide of the Palestinian people. It was wrong then and it's wrong now.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Conservatives are incapable of original thought. Every joke they have and every insult they sling is just something they heard from a leftist, bastardized.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 2 months ago

Maybe leftists could drop the insults and adopt healing language...

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

The right has gone full Reich.

No. I would rather go to prison than ever speak kindly to a Nazi.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth -1 points 2 months ago

I don't think "they go low, we go low" is improving anything.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Killing Nazis is high, not low. Don't be a fence sitter about fucking Nazis. JFC centrists are so unhelpful.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago

I'm talking about rhetoric. Friend, I'm probably more left than you might imagine. And I'd very well imagine the current Israeli administration saying the same thing you just said, about Palestinians. As I age, and continue to temper the worst parts of myself, I've come to ~~understand~~, innerstand,* overstand, and understand, good and evil may be opposites, but they occupy the same spectrum as life and death, light and darkness. I pray at some point, you will, too.

*The tech-moneymasters who appropriate all things to ai in their bid to be omniscient immortals can't seem to grasp the value of certain other appropriated words, yet.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Philosophy doesn't mean shit in a genocide.

[-] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

Everybody appropriates.

This language that you are speaking is appropriated from a bunch of other languages and cultures.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

Is it appropriation if you treat people and their culture with respect? Because i dont think the issue here is how the KKK dresses. It is what they stand for ideologically and what they do. That is what makes it appropriation imo.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago

I want to agree with you, but I'm not so sure. I think different individuals have very different thoughts on that. And now I need to sit with this for a while.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes, has no inherent bias or prejudice.

[-] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago

Are you asking me?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago
[-] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

True, but there are nuances. Stealing a symbol and giving it new meaning by using it for a different purpose is obviously a worse kind of appropriation than adopting language and culture.

[-] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

So it's not just regular appropriation, it's the bad kind of appropriation. Because they're bad.

Have I got that right?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Appropriation implies a form of exclusivity and denying the original's validity. As in:

KKK took that symbol and forever changed everyone's association with it to their own org.

It's not appropriation to use a thing, it's appropriation to treat your use of the thing as the correct/real one.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

Yes. Cause it's different when I do it. I really have to sit with this.

[-] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

Specifically Catholic. It’s a great example of appropriation.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

So annoying. Same with swastika.

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

So just a slightly different flavor.

[-] Amberskin@europe.pub 5 points 2 months ago

To give some context, originally a ‘nazareno’ is somebody paying penitence for sins committed since last years Easter. Part of their ‘penitence’ is to march in procession covered with those robes. The ‘capirote’ (the hood) is intended to keep those sinners (that could be important or well known people) anonymous.

I’m not sure if this is still valid today or if it’s now just a performance. Someone from the south of Spain will more about that than myself.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
717 points (98.9% liked)

Funny

10856 readers
233 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS