995

Originally this was a reply to this article about a Windows feature called Recall, but there's a good argument the author's concerns resonate far beyond Windows and Meta to proprietary generally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Stop worrying about the country of origin. It's a FOSS project. The vast majority of Pop's components are developed independently of the company, and by citizens of various nations. Applying the "USA bad, so product bad" rhetoric is a seriously shortsighted approach. Consider instead the amount of influence exerted by the company. Does Ubuntu still seem like the better choice just because the company is headquartered in the UK?

Besides, if you really want to cut American software out of your life, start with Linux and GNU. Torvalds was born in Finland, but he is a naturalized US citizen, and Linux is developed on American infrastructure and includes significant amount of work from American developers.

[-] ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

It's not “USA bad, so product bad”, it's the concern that the US government can do a lot more to US based projects and you probably wont know untill it's too late.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 day ago

The code is open though, I don't check it since I am an idiot but I assume pros would spot irregularities.

Do you have a specific vector of attack here in mind?

[-] ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I guess most methods of attack on a FOSS projects are independent of the country of origin. But, I could still see them being forced to do things they don't want in the US, without being able to tell anyone. Hopefully if that ever happened it wouldn't be too hard to detect, but you never know.

[-] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

People find vulnerabilities and malware even in closed source projects. Us regime is as malicious as it is incompetent. They trust anyone who can throw a sig heil and prompt a LLM to completely dismantle and rebuild major infrastructure.

That's really not the case, there's no proprietary parts to inject this into, and pop is one of the most heavily watched distros for a reason.

The minimal things they add to their particular distro are essentially just theming, and it'd be really obvious if they injected something malicious into it.

It would also NOT be too late because they're a stable distro and have regular releases, it'd have to be a completely last minute unexpected change for that to be the case.

[-] albert180@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

They can still sanction your country and then you can't get updates anymore over official ways, like Fedora and Iran.

It's just peace of mind to not deal with anything US Based right now

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
995 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

37311 readers
817 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS