226
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/games@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

If you think cosmetic lootboxes are comparable to porn, you're too stupid for internet access and your handler should limit your screen time in the future until a cure is found for whatever thing is currently affecting you.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

The reading comprehension situation is crazy

LaLuzDelSol does not think cosmetic loot boxes are comparable to porn. They were making an analogy, not an equation. "A is like B in that C" does not imply that A is morally equivalent to B, it means that they share a similarity. In this case, "putting 10 minutes of hardcore sex in an otherwise g-rated film" is like "incorporating gambling into an otherwise child-friendly game," in that "even if the majority of the work is child-friendly, the not-child-friendly aspects make the work as a whole not child-friendly."

[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 25 minutes ago

The analogy only works if you believe gambling does the same relative harm as porn.

That is the problem I have with their terrible attempt at an analogy. Not only does it imply it's comparable, it has to be for the analogy to work as intended.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

❌ Incorrect

An analogy is not an equation. Porn is harmful to children, and access should be age restricted to the fullest extent possible without interfering with the rights of grown adults. Gambling is harmful for children, and should be age restricted to the fullest extent possible without interfering with the rights of grown adults. They don't cause the same amount of harm, but a movie that features hardcore sex should be rated AO just like a game that incorporates gambling should be rated M.

You see how they share that similarity, despite not being morally equivalent?

[-] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

You should know better than to assume that the average Lemmy user understands analogies. Lemmy users are generally pretty smart when it comes to technology, but not when it comes to interpersonal communication or politics

It's comparable to gambling—you should keep up with the thread.

this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
226 points (96.7% liked)

Games

18923 readers
450 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS