31
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by kingofras@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We have a basic rule that the headline must match the article. Current headline reads:

"Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson"

I'll give you a fair shot to correct it before just removing it.

[-] kingofras@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Done. Only because I respect you.

It doesn’t make sense that rule. But you’ll disagree anyway and there’s never a chance of winning a mod argument anyway.

The article headline you want is pointless and meaningless to the 99% of the world who visits this.

Peter Dutton to leave Coalition leaderless, conceding he has lost his seat of Dickson

I added context and a little bit of juice to it so it would make for a better headline for non-Australians. Did I add some anti Trump sentiment? Sure. Did that misconstrue the content of the article? No.

I understand the current rule makes it easy to mod the place, but it also means you don’t let the OP add context for Lemmy. The rule should be: you can’t misconstrue the content of the article.

Anyway, I appreciate all you mods do and I respect the rules that are in place.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I disagree.

Not modifying headings is a fairly universal rule.

Making it "easier to mod" is an understatement. If you let people "adapt titles to be more suitable for lemmy" or whatever you did, then you'll spend all day having arguments about what adoptions are appropriate. It's unworkable with volunteer mods.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

It's so pathetic that the top comment chain is discussing this pedantic issue instead of the actual article. Thank god for this moderation or my experience may have been slightly degraded.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It's a pretty fundamental aspect of content aggregators. If posters editorialise the articles they post it becomes an echochamber for a very confined range of opinions.

[-] kingofras@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Counterpoint. I posted an article from the Australian national broadcaster. They have their flaws but they aint breitbart.

While I sensationalised the title and added my 2 cents in the original OP I cross posted to this community, I linked to a nice source and created a more world context friendly title, yet far from disingenuous click bait.

The upvotes and the comments are largely based on that.

What this rule is currently accomplishing:

  • people will just post sensationalist sources with clickbaity titles and questionable journalism
  • or people will create sensationalist titles for neutral higher quality sources and then the top comment is always going to be about this level of virtue signalling.

What’s the point of a community if these are the rules? You’re asking for bad sources and at best or you’re just a comment section provider for legacy media.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

Why has everyone started saying "counterpoint" all of a sudden. Every comment is a counterpoint.

Counterpoint. Hopefully people aren't idiots that upvote sensational headlines.

Counterpoint. Everything I already said.

Counterpoint. You could make your own community where people sensationalise headlines.

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Counterpoint: I haven't noticed that being a trend until this thread.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Qualification: I've only seen it a handful of times in the last few days.

Assertion: Still very irritating.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Didn't say moderation isn't necessary, it is. What I said is it's sad the top comment chain is about moderation.

I opened this post to read comments out of curiosity, I still don't even know the context of this article because the top comment is about the title which I find sad.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

If only there was some way to determine which content was shown on your device.

Like when there's too much content to show at once, maybe it could be organised in a tall "page" and you could jump around to read different comments.

Although it would be tall enough it's more like a scroll I guess. You could "zoom" up or down the scroll and read those comments you found interesting or engaging.

Actually, maybe you could get users to promote those comments they found most interesting and demote others.

It's a shame nothing like this exists.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

If only there was some way to determine which content was shown on your device.

Not really sure how to filter posts whose top comment is regarding moderation, pretty damn specific filter. Then again your comment is a large giant nothing burger that continues to ignore the point I'm attempting to emphasize so I don't think you really thought it through in the first place.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

I'll spell it out for you mate.

Scroll past the comments that don't interest you. That's it. You don't need to reply to every comment that you don't find engaging.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

The enlightenment!

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm curious what your headline orginally was

[-] kingofras@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You can see it in the crosspost

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ty! Makes a bit more sense as it does give context. The 'booting to the curb' was a bit editorialized. But if like me, you have no idea who Dutton and Dickson are it's a lot clearer.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Your original headline was better. New one makes no sense to me M

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks @kingofras@lemmy.world ! I know the rules are a pain, but really it helps prevent shitposting. Imagine coming into a community and just seeing variations on "xxx is a dumbass/shithead/etc. etc." all the way down. :)

[-] PagPag@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Just remove it.

People who do this shit are actively making this place worse.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol "the people actually making content are the problem" y'all are fucking clowns.

Can we just be loose with the moderation while the "top" posts don't even get 2k upvotes.

It gave lemmy content, it led to engaging discussions, who tf cares if the title is bad.

Jesus Christ I don't understand this mentality

You've made 3 posts in 2 years, op contributed to more fediverse in a day than you did in two years.

You really want to make this place better, then quit your bitchin or contribute more and your bitchin will be more understandable

[-] PagPag@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Editorialized titles distract from the content. There’s enough crazy ass shit happening globally that the added sensationalism isn’t necessary.

Either way, maybe calm down a bit lmao.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If you take an article title directly from a local newspaper and post it verbatim on World News, nobody will know what the fuck it's about and regardless of its content, it won't see the light of day. It's important that the article title is relevant to the audience.

[-] PagPag@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Okay, provided and example of this.

Jfc, it’s like I’m talking to kids lol.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Having civilized discourse on a topic is not childish. I'm sorry you feel that way.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

maybe calm down a bit

While my tone wasn't cordial it also wasn't ALL CAPS SAYING KYS

You may be projecting a bit?

Regardless I've seen this garbage take on lemmy enough that I'm not going to politely point out the fault. I'll check their Lemmy contributions and call them fucking clowns if they are saying silly shit like "remove content me no likey for pendantic reasons" while contributing nothing to posts.

It's alotta reddit entitlement and I will attempt to call it out when i see it and I'm not going to be pleasant about it

[-] kingofras@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

At your service.

That’s what I thought about you when I read your message.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Man fuck em, thank you for adding to the fediverse OP! You should look at non .world communities. .world is the more shitty instance filled with "um actually......" Style users and mods

this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)

World News

46569 readers
1774 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS