25
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
25 points (87.9% liked)
Casual Conversation
3260 readers
289 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Go watch OddTaxi. Masterpiece of the 2020s era IMO.
It's about a murder. The Taxi Driver (main character) has all the knowledge because he remembers all of his customers. And a set of his customers is related to the murder.
https://youtu.be/jX-Ry1VxeDQ
The episodes are formulaic:
New customer gets picked up
Minutes of talking in the Taxi.
A side note from another characters perspective (nurse, Pop Idols, comedians on the radio, etc. etc). Kinda random, but it's surprisingly helpful context for the murder mystery.
You'll find that the Seinen genre is low key and more emotionally mature. Sienen are made for adults after all. Death Note is still a Shonen at the end of the day (Teenager Anime)
I cannot stand anthropormophized characters. I don't know what it is and well aware that it's a personal thing but it drives me absolutely insane. That also feels way too... cutesy. Death Note I liked because it's dark. Whether its for teenagers doesn't matter so much to me as the tone of it. All the shows that I watch are usually pretty darker in tone, mysterious as hell, and with a plot that you've gotta figure out. Stuff like Severance, Westworld, Hannibal, The Expanse, even How to Get Away with Murder. Character driven stories that have a mystery with wits being involved more than strength but that also are dark. Death Note surprised me because it managed to hit every single one of those things but with the added benefit of something I'm always looking for but can rarely find. The main character being the bad guy. I am so overwhelmingly bored of the good guy winning, especially when it doesn't reflect reality. I like stuff that subverts expectations to an extent and the expectation for me is good always triumps over evil.
If you want a more standard grimdark about bad guy main character pillaging and conquering with his army of Demons, I guess Overlord is for you.
I found OddTaxi to be far more emotionally mature than Overlord though. But Overlord hits at the more immediately obvious bad guy wins tropes.
I don't consider Overlord to be of masterpiece quality. But it does scratch the itch
https://youtu.be/vci9YwpFFcA
I still say OddTaxi is worth it. It's probably darker than you think it is. I'd argue that most of the characters in OddTaxi were smarter and better written than Death Note even (the intelligence level of Death Note was basically 'I know something you don't know'. Meanwhile in OddTaxi, the flaws of each perspective makes far more sense and nuance)
Overlord purposely flips the script. Every new arch a new set of heroes is introduced and then BRUTALLY MURDERED by the demons / in the glory of Ains Opal Gown. You watch the steady progress as this group of villains takes over the new world under the name of the God of Death, Overlord of Undeath.
The joy of Overlord for me is how hard the author reverse engineers villainous monologues or other stereotypical effects. Ains places gold at the top of his base to test the greed of the heroes. They took the money yet continue to explore, clearly they're greedy pigs and liars who must be destroyed. If they were only invading his home dungeon for the money, they should have been satisfied with the riches on the first floor yet they explore deeper. They must be punished.