71
submitted 6 days ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 22 points 6 days ago

Oh person writing for bloomberg, this is a good thing for china. A proletarian dictatorship should not become a major arms trader. It should design and stockpile weapons primarily for its own defensive use. American arms manufacturing has to deal with a myriad of issues due to its nature as a global supply chain and global war machine.

I find it reassuring that despite having such a massive economy and export dominance in almost all industries, and despite having such large quantities of arms production, virtually all of it is for defensive purposes. Although this may just be cope.

[-] someone@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

A proletarian dictatorship should not become a major arms trader.

If those arms are going to countries looking to defend themselves from imperialists, why not?

[-] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

It is not a problem to help nations trying to defend themselves from imperialists. I don't think there is anything wrong with selling weapons to certain countries like pakisthan who need defending from India.

However, becoming a "major arms trader" is a different thing. It is problematic for many reasons.

  1. You need to start putting money into R&D for a lot of different weapons, each suited to a different situation to satisfy the diverse needs of your diverse clientele.
  2. The above also makes scaling up production a challenge, as you have more product lines.
  3. Selling weapons to lots of countries creates a political problem. The public of the countries you sell to will question why they are relying on you.
  4. It creates perverse incentives. Consider this psychotic shit for example.
[-] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Note that perverse incentives come from all arms selling, not only if it's major.

You will now only give significant support to those countries which need it the least (rich ones), need to engage in predatory economics or outright imperialism to efficiently manufacture arms (else you'll strip your own resources and may not have enough to defend yourself), passively (if not actively) encourage those who buy from you to engage in more war (as they will know they can acquire more weapons if needed), and create a reputation for yourself as responsible for global violence (people will notice it is your weapons being used to exterminate their loved ones, and that you did it for money).

There is never a net benefit to making death into a market.

[-] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 5 days ago

It's not cope. Selling weapons is a terrible idea and whitey only does it because of a terminal money addiction.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

news

24041 readers
866 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS