94

DION NISSENBAUM: We were able to find a key U.S. official to talk to us, who told us that U.S. personnel went to the scene in the West Bank city of Jenin, where Shireen was killed, to try and figure out what happened. And their initial assessment was that the Israeli soldier intentionally targeted Shireen.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, "WHO KILLED SHIREEN?")

UNIDENTIFIED US OFFICIAL: It was an indication that it was an intentional killing of, at this point in time, Shireen Abu Akleh. They would have absolutely known that it was a media person - or not combatants, at a minimum - that that person shot and killed.

FADEL: In the film, as you can hear, the former U.S. official's voice is distorted. NPR's Daniel Estrin also spoke to that former U.S. official, who also requested anonymity from us to discuss sensitive internal government discussions. The official said the U.S. initially found that the killing was intentional - that the soldier would have known he was shooting at a journalist. But he said those findings were changed, and ultimately, the U.S. concluded there was no reason to believe the shooting was intentional. Again, Dion Nissenbaum.

NISSENBAUM: That initial assessment was essentially overruled by the Biden administration, and they came out and said explicitly that it was unintentional.

FADEL: So what did you make of that when you heard that?

NISSENBAUM: For me, the - one of the main reasons I wanted to do this documentary is that so many people just don't understand what happened to Shireen that day. And, you know, the Israeli investigation itself concluded that it was very likely that an Israeli soldier falsely identified Shireen as a militant and intentionally killed her. That really is not in debate. There were no militants near her that they were aiming for. She was not caught in any crossfire. The Israeli investigation itself concluded that the soldier intentionally shot her.

FADEL: Did you find Shireen's killer?

NISSENBAUM: We did find Shireen's killer. He was a 20-year-old soldier who was on his first combat deployment in the West Bank, and we were able to track him down. And he actually was himself killed in Jenin last summer, so he was killed in the city where he killed Shireen.

...

FADEL: What do you hope this film will achieve?

NISSENBAUM: I'm hoping that it will lead to some reflections from the Israeli military about the way that they operate in the West Bank around civilians and journalists. I'm hoping that the U.S. government will reflect on its own responsibility in trying to seek some justice for an American citizen who was killed by the Israeli military. I hope there's some reflection from U.S. officials about ways that they can stand up for Americans in that situation.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250508211133/https://www.npr.org/2025/05/08/nx-s1-5384894/documentary-ids-israeli-soldier-who-allegedly-killed-journalist-shireen-abu-akleh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] floo@retrolemmy.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Make sure not to put the title of the documentary in the headline, that will make it much easier for the Israel and the United States to erase it from history.

Also, make sure to be as elusive as possible about the name of the creator. Maybe don’t even mention them at all.

Perhaps consider deleting this post since it gets way too much information

Someone might make the foolish mistake of thinking you’re trying to spread awareness.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

News

29443 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS