684
On trees... (mander.xyz)
submitted 10 hours ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] m_xy@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

here’s a cool blog post that expands on this There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

i didn’t even put it in a bookmark folder, it’s just loose on my bookmark bar because it’s such an interesting post that i reread from time to time

[-] Thadden@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

That was a very fun and interesting reading! Thanks for sharing

[-] bananabenana@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Maybe...but I doubt many of these phylogenies use DNA, and if so, likely only a single or few genes. Nowhere near enough resolution to accurately determine genetic relatedness. Woody plants may actually be more related than we think.

These sorts of phylogenies tend to use morphological characteristics which is an unreliable measure of genetic relatedness.

I will stand corrected if wrong though

this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
684 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

14646 readers
2406 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com