27
submitted 2 weeks ago by TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

An objective press is supposed to report facts, not just the statements. An objective press does not mean not taking the side of fact and reality.

If a child with chocolate on their face said they didn't eat the chocolate donut, that's they are clearly seen eating in the CCTV footage, you don't report their statement with the same impact as what actually happened.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Child accused of eating donut pressing charges for defamation

Alleged donut eater found with chocolate on face says they were charged due to rushed investigation, profiling.

[Two years later]

Donut thief footage revealed. Cases formerly dismissed see new evidence, but suspect cannot be charged again.

It’s a joke what ‘objective’ headlines have become, because everything is predetermined by money and status or simple obfuscation.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8139 readers
349 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS