313
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That's half the point of the container... You let an expert set it up so you don't have to know it on that level. You can manage fast more containers this way.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

OK, but I'd rather be the expert.

And I have no troubling spinning up new services, fast. Currently sitting at around ~30 Internet-facing services, 0 docker containers, and reproducing those installs from scratch + restoring backups would be a single command plus waiting 5 minutes.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'd rather be the expert

Fair, but others, unless they are getting paid for it, just want their shit to work. Same as people who take their cars to a mechanic instead of wrenching on it themselves, or calling a handyman when stuff breaks at home. There's nothing wrong with that.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I literally get paid to do this type of work and there is no way for me to be an expert in all the services that our platform runs. Again, that's kind of the point. Let the person who writes the container be the expert. I'll provide the platform, the maintenance, upgrades, etc.. the developer can provide the expertise in their app.

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of times it is necessary to build the container oneself, e.g., to fix a bug, satisfy a security requirement, or because the container as-built just isn’t compatible with the environment. So in that case would you contract an expert to rebuild it, host it on a VM, look for a different solution, or something else?

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It's not like it's so hard to rebuild a container for the occasional services that needs it. but it's still much better than needing to do it with every single service

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It depends on the container I suppose. There are some that are very difficult to rebuild depending on what’s in it and what it does. Some very complex software can be ran in containers.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yep, some people sort of miss the point of microservices and make some fairly monolithic containers. Or they're legacy apps being shoehorned into a container. Some things still require handholding. FreeIPA is a good example. They have a container version, but it's just a monolithic install in a container and only recommended for testing.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Containerfiles are super easy to write. For the most part if you can do it in a VM, you can do it in a container. This sort of thing is why you would move to containers. Instead of being the "expert" in all the apps you run, you can focus on the things that actually need your attention.

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

reproducing those installs from scratch + restoring backups would be a single command plus waiting 5 minutes.

Is that with Ansible or your own tooling or something else?

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago

NixOS :)

Maybe I should have clarified that liking bare-metal does not imply disliking abstraction

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I’ve been wanting to tinker with NixOS. I’ve stuck in the stone ages automating VM deployments on my Proxmox cluster using ansible. One line and about 30 minutes (cuda install is a beast) to build a reproducible VM running llama.cpp with llama-swap.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago

Nice. My partner has a Proxmox setup, so we've adapted the Nix config to spin up new VMs of any machine with a single command.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
313 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

59464 readers
42 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS