31

Liberalism is when you believe in voting against fascism to lessen the burdens on engaging in actual leftist action, I guess.

Extremely dire turbolib statement here, RIP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

What I mean is in the same way you cannot be on the side of the Nazis in the 1940s, you cannot be on the side of Israel and supporting the Zionist cause.

I'm not on the side of Israel and supporting the Zionist cause. But when there are two options, you pick the less bad of the two. It's not fucking rocket science.

The Soviets in WW2 were committing genocide. Yet the question of winning the Second World War depended on cooperation with the Soviets.

With the same mindset that supporting literal genocidaires - the Soviets - was necessary to stop a worse outcome - the Nazis - so too was this past election. We had our choice of supporting the liberal coalition candidate, or the fascist coalition candidate. And all too many people decided they'd sooner see the Nazis win than side with genocidaires - despite the fact that siding 'against' the genocidaires did nothing to actually reduce the genocide being done - and, in fact, actually intensified the genocide you were supposedly protesting against.

Harm reduction is an explicit rejection of the idea that, in a tight situation, supporting the less-bad option is dedication to their cause. It is only supporting the less-bad option being the one to result. A vote takes, for most, an hour of your time, twice every two years. Most people spend more time fucking jacking off. If that's too much strain for you to save the lives of literal millions, you're a fucking LARPer, not someone who's interested in the welfare of marginalized groups oppressed by state power.

But if you're more interested in spiritualist, self-centered interpretations of politics, rather than political action as a way of improving lives and reducing harm, well, that kind of LARPers mindset is naturally geared against that very simple idea that a vote isn't a love letter. Who cares about outcomes? You have to keep your internal karma meter positive, or some stupid shit like that.

As previously stated, I won’t engage in bad faith arguments like

But a vote not for Kamala is a vote for Trump!

Sorry that you think inaction in support of the worse option is absolution?

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Soviets in WW2 were committing genocide. Yet the question of winning the Second World War depended on cooperation with the Soviets.

I love how you have framed a relationship between two allies of neccessity who were in the wake of a world war going to become superpowers as if it is equitable to a client state of a superpower committing genocide on its peoples internally while the superpower handed them essentially unlimited weapons and ran diplomatic cover for it while pretending to try to stop it.

You are clearly in denial and it shows.

The Palestinian Genocide is not a war, it is a genocide.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I love how you have framed a relationship between two allies of neccessity who were in the wake of a world war going to become

I'm sorry, is there something wrong with framing WW2 as dependent on the cooperation of the Western Allies with the Soviets?

superpowers as if it is equitable to a client state to a superpower committing genocide on its peoples internally while the superpower handed them essentially unlimited weapons and ran diplomatic cover for it while pretending to try to stop it.

... no, genius. I'm comparing siding with genocidal liberals against fascists to siding with genocidal Soviets against fascists.

Try rereading it.

You are clearly in denial and it shows.

The Palestinian Genocide is not a war, it is a genocide.

I'm sorry, where do you think I said otherwise?

Fuck's sake. I literally and explicitly called the current liberal position as supporting genocide.

Do you just... make up shit in your head instead of reading whatever it is you're supposedly replying to?

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I did and it just made less sense in terms of constructing a coherent intellectual argument.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
31 points (68.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
677 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS